The Annals Take our Readership Survey!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 1006-1008.
© 1997 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lum, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lum, B.


Research Articles

Enhancement of warfarin response in a patient receiving etoposide and carboplatin chemotherapy

AT Le, NK Hasson, and BL Lum

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a possible drug interaction between warfarin, carboplatin, and etoposide resulting in a marked increase in a patient's response to warfarin, and to outline monitoring strategies for this interaction. CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old white man receiving warfarin (average dose 42.5 mg/wk) for atrial fibrillation was diagnosed with a right testicular non-seminoma mixed germ cell tumor. Mediastinal metastases were subsequently discovered, and the patient was treated with a chemotherapy regimen including carboplatin and etoposide. Sixteen days after the first course of chemotherapy, the international normalized ratio (INR) was increased to 12.6 from a baseline range of 1.15-2.11 that was observed over the previous 8 months of therapy, indicating a clinically significant alteration in the pharmacodynamic response to warfarin. DISCUSSION: This patient had no concomitant disease or dietary changes to explain the altered response to warfarin. Carboplatin and etoposide have not been reported to inhibit warfarin metabolism. However, previous reports have suggested that etoposide may displace warfarin from its protein binding sites, resulting in an early elevation in prothrombin time following chemotherapy. The late elevation of INR observed in our patient suggests that his response to warfarin may have been due to the displacement of warfarin by elemental platinum, which has a long plasma half-life. CONCLUSIONS: This case report suggests a possible drug interaction between carboplatin, etoposide, and warfarin. Because of the risk associated with an increased response to warfarin, we recommend close monitoring of the INR, perhaps twice weekly, early and later in the time course following chemotherapy with these agents. Appropriate dosage adjustments of warfarin should be performed if an altered response to warfarin is observed.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1997 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.