The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 17-26.
© 1998 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennie, N.
Right arrow Articles by Einarson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kennie, N.
Right arrow Articles by Einarson, T.


Research Articles

Critical analysis of the pharmaceutical care research literature

NR Kennie, BG Schuster, and TR Einarson

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate published pharmaceutical care research and make recommendations to improve the quality of the literature. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using the key word "pharmaceutical care," limited to research articles published January 1988-December 1996. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that evaluated the provision of pharmaceutical care in a defined population. DATA EXTRACTION: Citations (title and abstract) identified were reviewed. Articles potentially meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and scored according to the Pharmaceutical Care Research Checklist for the presence of criteria including pharmaceutical care process, methodology, and measures/outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 979 citations were identified. Of 57 abstracts identified as potentially meeting the inclusion criteria, 43 articles were eliminated, 2 were rejected, and 12 were accepted for analysis. Deficiencies identified included: a lack of research in community practice (n = 2), randomized controlled trials (n = 3), workload measurement (n = 6), and patient satisfaction (n = 1). Scoring according to the Pharmaceutical Care Research Checklist also identified the following deficiencies (maximum Composite Criterion Score [CCS] of 24): description of population sample (CCS 17), dropouts (CCS 13), informed consent (CCS 8), pharmacist training/qualifications (CCS 9), instrument validity (CCS 10), structure criteria (CCS 4), patient outcomes (CCS 11), and economic outcomes (CCS 12). The mean total checklist score was 37 of 50 (range 31-46). CONCLUSIONS: Few research studies have evaluated the provision of pharmaceutical care in a defined population. Deficiencies identified by low CCSs demonstrated the need for quality research design and a clear description of the pharmaceutical care process to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical care. Recommendations for improvement in research design were made.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. Machado, J. Bajcar, G. C Guzzo, and T. R Einarson
Sensitivity of Patient Outcomes to Pharmacist Interventions. Part II: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Hypertension Management
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 1770 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
T. M. Davis, R. M Clifford, W. A Davis, and K. T Batty
The role of pharmaceutical care in diabetes management
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, November 1, 2005; 5(6): 352 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. L Carter and A. J Zillich
Pharmaceutical Care Services for Patients with Hypertension
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2003; 37(9): 1335 - 1337.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1998 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.