The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 837-839. DOI 10.1345/aph.17463
© 1998 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ling, C.
Right arrow Articles by Crouch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ling, C.
Right arrow Articles by Crouch, M.


Research Articles

Theophylline for chronic symptomatic bradycardia in the elderly

CA Ling and MA Crouch

The treatment of choice for chronic, symptomatic bradycardia is the placement of a cardiac pacemaker. Individuals who refuse or cannot tolerate pacemaker insertion usually require pharmacologic therapy. Hydralazine, prazosin, anticholinergics, and sympathomimetic agents have been administered for this indication, but adverse effects and limited data hinder routine, long-term use. Theophylline has emerged as a reasonable alternative strategy. For the medical management of bradycardia in the elderly, the literature supports theophylline dosages between 400 and 600 mg/d (approximately 8 mg/kg/d) administered in divided doses. This dosage range should result in a steady-state serum concentration between 5 and 15 mg/L. While some investigators recommend potentially higher initial doses (up to 12 mg/kg/d), lower dosages are more appropriate in the elderly due to decreased theophylline clearance. Initial dosage titration may be indicated and prolonged therapy is expected on the basis of the common etiologies of bradycardia in this patient group. Patient specifics such as altered theophylline metabolism (e.g., smoking), drug interactions (e.g., ciprofloxacin), and concomitant disease states (e.g., hepatic disease, heart failure) should always be considered in theophylline dosage recommendations. Clinicians should adjust the theophylline dose on the basis of patient response, including heart rate and clinical symptomatology, as well as measurement of occasional theophylline concentrations, if deemed appropriate. Theophylline should be avoided in the bradycardia-tachycardia manifestations of sick sinus syndrome or when ventricular ectopy is frequent. Additional investigation will further define the role of theophylline in elderly patients with chronic, symptomatic bradycardia.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1998 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.