The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 1258-1261. DOI 10.1345/aph.19067
© 1999 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrelts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrelts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D.


Research Articles

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerance of cefepime administered as an intravenous bolus or as a rapid infusion

JC Garrelts and DJ Wagner

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of cefepime administered as an intravenous bolus and short infusion. METHODS: A single-dose, pharmacokinetic study was conducted on 16 healthy men. Fifty milliliters of a 40 mg/mL solution of cefepime was administered by continuous infusion in intervals of three, five, 10, or 15 minutes. Blood was sampled three minutes through 12 hours after the end of the infusion. Analysis of cefepime was performed by reverse-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection. Cefepime plasma concentrations versus time were evaluated by noncompartmental methods. History and physical examinations were conducted within two weeks of the start of the study, 24 hours before dosing, and at the end of the study. Assessments for adverse events were made throughout the study. RESULTS: Maximum concentration (Cmax) increased with decreasing time of infusion and was similar to reference values of Cmax. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of cefepime were not affected by the time of infusion and were on average: mean residence time was 2.3 hours, half-life 1.9 hours, the AUC extrapolated to infinity 239 microg x h/mL, total body clearance 142 mL/min, and steady-state volume of distribution 19 L. No serious adverse events, local tolerance at injection site, or significant laboratory abnormalities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime 2 g was safely administered to healthy subjects as a rapid, single bolus, and its key pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with those from longer infusions and other studies.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1999 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.