The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 318-324. DOI 10.1345/aph.18006
© 1999 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wooster, M.
Right arrow Articles by Luzier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wooster, M.
Right arrow Articles by Luzier, A.


Research Articles

Reteplase: a new thrombolytic for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction

MB Wooster and AB Luzier

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the published data on reteplase, the most recent thrombolytic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the management of acute myocardial infarction in adults. DATA SOURCES: Published data on reteplase identified by MEDLINE searches (January 1985-June 1997), as well as other pertinent literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Reteplase is a new thrombolytic agent derived from human tissue plasminogen activator. Its mechanism of action is similar to that of alteplase, but it differs in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Certain structural changes contribute to differences in pharmacokinetic properties such as a prolonged half-life (15 min), which allows it to be administered as two 10-MU bolus injections. Reteplase has been shown to have fibrin specificity similar to that of alteplase, but with a lower binding affinity for fibrin. This enables reteplase to bind to the thrombus repeatedly and increases its fibrinolytic potential. In clinical trials, reteplase demonstrated more rapid and complete coronary patency compared with alteplase, without a significant increase in clinical adverse events. However, the improvement in coronary artery patency with reteplase versus alteplase did not result in a reduction in mortality in the GUSTO III trial. CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence that use of reteplase results in an improved coronary artery patency rate versus accelerated infusion alteplase, an improvement in mortality rate with reteplase was not shown. Reteplase may have an advantage over alteplase due to a more rapid and simpler dosing regimen, but the significance of this difference is yet to be determined.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1999 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.