The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 833-839. DOI 10.1345/aph.18332
© 1999 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wandstrat, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nahata, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wandstrat, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nahata, M.


Research Articles

Tetravalent rotavirus vaccine

TL Wandstrat, B Kaplan-Machlis, ME Temple, and MC Nahata

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic data about the use of rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) in infants and children. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1990-December 1998) was conducted to identify all publications on the RRV-TV vaccine including pharmacology, clinical trials, adverse effects, and pharmacoeconomics in infants and children. Bibliographies of articles were also used. STUDY SELECTION: All randomized and placebo-controlled clinical efficacy trials were reviewed. Additionally, pharmacoeconomic studies focusing on the potential impact on healthcare costs were chosen for review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis is a significant problem in developed and developing countries. Various forms of a rotavirus vaccine have been studied worldwide. The tetravalent vaccine appears to have similar efficacy in developed and developing countries. It seems to be most effective against the most severe forms of gastroenteritis, with an 80% overall efficacy rate. This vaccine is well tolerated; the most common adverse effect is fever after the first dose. Pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that although the vaccine may be only moderately effective against less severe gastroenteritis, over $1 billion annually could potentially be saved in the US with its universal use. CONCLUSIONS: The new rotavirus vaccine is effective in preventing and reducing the incidence of rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis. The morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs from this disease may be reduced if this vaccine is provided to children worldwide.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 1999 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.