Characteristics of tranquilizer use among Australian Vietnam War veterans

OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics of tranquilizer use in a cohort of Australian Vietnam War veterans. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of medication use and assessment of social and clinical variables, including tranquilizer dependence. PATIENTS: Fifty-one Australian Vietnam War veterans were recruited from the department of psychiatry of an Australian teaching hospital. All subjects were men, with a mean +/- SD age of 52.2 +/- 3.3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A structured interview was used to obtain details of medical and psychiatric history, medication use, substance use, forensic history, and health service utilization data. Anxiety was assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A). A validated tranquilizer dependence rating scale was administered for each patient. RESULTS: Commonly used tranquilizers included diazepam (n = 19 patients) and zopiclone (26). Most patients (44) reported the use of one or more drugs for the purpose of nighttime sedation, while exclusive daytime use of tranquilizers for anxiolytic effect was uncommon. The median time spent in the hospital during the preceding year was 21.0 +/- 56.8 days. Symptoms of anxiety were prevalent, with a mean Ham-A score of 35.5 +/- 7.8. Screening criteria suggestive of tranquilizer dependence were met in 34 subjects. Health service utilization was correlated with tranquilizer intake and overall medication use. Tranquilizer dependence was independently associated with cigarette smoking (p = 0.039; odds ratio = 5.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 24.33). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the nature of tranquilizer use in an Australian population of Vietnam War veterans. The extensive use of these drugs suggests that further research and possibly intervention in this area is needed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. P Alderman and A. L Gilbert A Qualitative Investigation of Long-Term Zopiclone Use and Sleep Quality Among Vietnam War Veterans with PTSD Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2009; 43(10): 1576 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]