The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 1265-1268. DOI 10.1345/aph.10076
© 2000 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teefy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kovacs, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teefy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kovacs, M.


Research Articles

Warfarin resistance due to sulfasalazine

AM Teefy, JE Martin, and MJ Kovacs

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of warfarin resistance associated with the use of sulfasalazine. CASE SUMMARY: A 37-year-old white woman on oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin was being evaluated for complaints of joint pains. Her past medical history consisted of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis, asthma, and ulcerative colitis. Warfarin concentrations had consistently remained within the therapeutic range with dosages of approximately 30 mg per week. In an attempt to treat arthritis, her gastroenterologist replaced 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) with sulfasalazine 1000 mg four times daily. Subsequent to the medication changes, the international normalized ratio (INR) decreased and remained at subtherapeutic concentrations despite increases in the warfarin dosage. During this period, the patient developed a deep-vein thrombosis in the right popliteal vein. The INR did not return to an acceptable level until six weeks after sulfasalazine was started. The new warfarin dosage was 75 mg per week, a 250% dosage increase. When sulfasalazine was discontinued and 5-ASA reinstituted, the warfarin dosage requirements to achieve therapeutic INRs returned to weekly dosages of approximately 45 mg. DISCUSSION: Sulfonamides have been well documented to enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. This patient developed a new deep-vein thrombosis due to failure in maintaining therapeutic INR levels after the recent introduction of sulfasalazine. We suspect that she developed warfarin resistance secondary to concomitant use of sulfasalazine. This patient demonstrated warfarin resistance as opposed to enhanced anticoagulant effect with sulfasalazine. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians managing warfarin therapy should exercise caution when sulfasalazine is added to a patient's medical regimen. This case suggests a possible warfarin-sulfasalazine interaction that resulted in warfarin resistance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. M. Holbrook, J. A. Pereira, R. Labiris, H. McDonald, J. D. Douketis, M. Crowther, and P. S. Wells
Systematic Overview of Warfarin and Its Drug and Food Interactions
Arch Intern Med, May 23, 2005; 165(10): 1095 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
H. Zhou, A. Patat, V. Parks, M. Buckwalter, D. Metzger, and J. Korth-Bradley
Absence of a Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Etanercept and Warfarin
J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2004; 44(5): 543 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2000 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.