The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 1389-1394. DOI 10.1345/aph.19104
© 2000 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugo-Goytia, G
Right arrow Articles by Castaneda-Hernandez, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lugo-Goytia, G
Right arrow Articles by Castaneda-Hernandez, G


Research Articles

Bayesian approach to control of amikacin serum concentrations in critically ill patients with sepsis

G Lugo-Goytia and G Castaneda-Hernandez

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive performance of a Bayesian program incorporating a population model with and without severity of illness covariates in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis. DESIGN: The clinical, physiologic, and pharmacokinetic data of 62 patients with sepsis admitted to a tertiary-care center were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to a active group and a validation group. The model was developed using a three-step approach involving Bayesian estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters, selection of covariates by principal component analysis, and final selection of covariates by stepwise multiple linear regression. The predictive performance of this model was tested in patients from the validation group and compared with that of a general population model without covariates. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed that the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was the most important determinant for amikacin volume of distribution (1.5 L/kg, APACHE II; r2 = 0.77). For amikacin clearance (CIamik), creatinine clearance (CIcr), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and use of catecholamines (CAT) were the most important predictors (CIamik = 44.5 + 0.67 CIcr - 1.29 PEEP - 8.34 CAT; r2 = 0.72). The relative mean error (deltaME) and root mean-square error (deltaRMSE) (95% CI) were -0.62 (-1.2 to 0.01) and 3.78 (2.3 to 4.8) mg/L, respectively. Since the 95% CI for deltaRMSE did not include zero, it appears that the model with covariates is significantly improved in terms of precision. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, in ICU patients treated with amikacin, it is relevant to consider covariates related to pathophysiologic status and therapeutic measures. Application of a Bayesian program allows improved control of the pharmacokinetic parameters in patients who exhibit rapidly changing physiologic conditions.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2000 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.