The Annals the journal of Pharmacy Technology
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 839-842. DOI 10.1345/aph.19258
© 2000 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gangar, M
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gangar, M
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, C.


Research Articles

Frequency of cutaneous reactions on rechallenge with nevirapine and delavirdine

M Gangar, G Arias, JG O'Brien, and CA Kemper

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of cutaneous reactions in a group of HIV-infected adults attending a public hospital HIV clinic who received nevirapine, delavirdine, or both, as well as the consequences of rechallenge with the same or alternative agent. DESIGN: The medical records of patients who had received either or both agents between March 1997 and July 1998 were reviewed, including 69 patients who initially received nevirapine and 20 who initially received delavirdine. Gender, ethnicity, HIV status, and plasma HIV RNA concentrations were analyzed as risk factors for the development of rash. RESULTS: The overall incidence of rash attributed to the initial use of one of these drugs was 37.1%. While rash due to delavirdine occurred more often, the rash due to nevirapine was more severe and resulted in hospitalization more frequently. There was a trend toward a higher frequency of rash in Latinos and possibly in women, but HIV status, CD4+ cell counts, and plasma HIV RNA were not risk factors for the development of rash. Drug therapy was temporarily or permanently discontinued because of rash in 19 of 69 (28%) and in five of 20 (25%) patients initially receiving nevirapine or delavirdine, respectively. Rash recurred in six of eight (75%) patients rechallenged with the same agent, and in seven of 10 (70%) who were crossed over to the alternative agent because of rash. Fever, in the absence of any apparent cause, was a significant predictor for the development of rash in patients receiving nevirapine. CONCLUSIONS: There is probably little value in attempting to retreat patients with cutaneous reactions, even with the alternative agent, except in patients with limited treatment options.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2000 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.