The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 92-108. DOI 10.1345/aph.19117
© 2001 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holdsworth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holdsworth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, P


Research Articles

Efficacy of colony-stimulating factors in acute leukemia

MT Holdsworth and P Mathew

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature describing the safety and efficacy of the hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) for the management of treatment-related adverse effects in patients with acute leukemia. DATA SOURCES: A systematic MEDLINE search of the English-language literature (1995-April 2000) was performed to identify all randomized trials evaluating CSF use in acute leukemia. The following search terms were used: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, filgrastim, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, sargramostim, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia. The references from relevant literature were also examined in order to identify reports not discovered in the MEDLINE search. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six randomized trials in pediatric ALL, nine in adult AML, and four in adult ALL have examined the safety and efficacy of the CSFs. Two of the pediatric trials supported a reduction in either the duration of hospitalization or in the incidence of febrile neutropenia when a CSF was employed during the consolidation or intensification phase of chemotherapy. The remaining pediatric trials failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit. In adult AML, eight of the nine trials showed a significant decrease in the time to neutrophil recovery when a CSF was used. Only one of these trials demonstrated a decrease in hospital stay and none showed a decreased incidence of infection for patients who received a CSF. Three of the four trials in adult ALL demonstrated the efficacy of a CSF in decreasing the number of days to neutrophil recovery. Only one trial demonstrated that a CSF led to a reduction in the number of hospital days. Trials in children or adults have not demonstrated that the CSFs influence the long-term outcome of patients with acute leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: The published studies document a decrease in the time to recovery from neutropenia when patients with acute leukemia are treated with a CSF. However, a consistent reduction in infectious complications or in the duration of hospitalization has not been demonstrated when a CSF is used for either pediatric or adult patients. Very limited data exist to support the premise that CSFs meet the criteria established by the American Society of Clinical Oncology for demonstrating the value of these agents. Further careful study focused on resource utilization and pharmacoeconomics may help to elucidate how healthcare institutions may most effectively employ CSFs to treat patients with acute leukemia.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2001 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.