The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 1648-1652. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A100
© 2001 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mategrano, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gabay, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mategrano, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gabay, M.


Research Articles

Misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

VA Mategrano and MP Gabay

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the data regarding the use of misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent literature was identified through a MEDLINE search (1966-January 2001) and through other secondary literature databases and/or bibliographies of pertinent articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: New strategies in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage are being evaluated due to the obstacles surrounding conventional therapies. One therapeutic option is the use of misoprostol. This literature review evaluates the published clinical data involving misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Current data suggest that the use of misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage reduces mean estimated blood loss compared with placebo. However, no clinical trials have detected a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage in misoprostol-treated subjects. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of misoprostol compared with conventional uterotonics, such as oxytocin or Syntometrine. CONCLUSIONS: In situations where conventional oxytocics are not readily available, storage requirements for oxytocics cannot be met, or the equipment for parenteral administration is not obtainable, misoprostol may be an acceptable prophylactic option.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2001 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.