The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 281-284. DOI 10.1345/aph.10183
© 2001 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sajbel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sajbel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiley, R.


Research Articles

Converting patients from brand-name clozapine to generic clozapine

TA Sajbel, GW Carter, and RB Wiley

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and dosage requirements when patients taking brand-name clozapine (Clozaril, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) are converted to generic clozapine (Zenith Goldline). METHODS: In November 1999, patients at Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo taking Clozaril were changed to generic clozapine. Seventeen patients had been prescribed Clozaril for three years and were included in the study. Drug dosage, white blood cell (WBC) count values, and adverse drug reaction reports were compared. Data regarding patients on the brand-name product were evaluated retrospectively for the months of November, December, January, and February during the years 1996/1997, 1997/1998, and 1998/1999. These data were compared with those from the same patients after switching to generic clozapine for the same months in 1999/2000. A one-year comparison of brand-name (1998/1999) with generic drug (1999/2000) was also performed. Statistical analysis included a standard test comparing WBC values and a Brown-Forsythe test for comparing dosages. RESULTS: There were no differences between the values obtained for the brand-name and generic products. WBC counts for the three-year data resulted in a p value of 0.9992. There was no difference when comparing the samples one year prior to switching and after the switch (p = 0.9991). There was no difference in dosages at three years or one year (p = 0.9999 and p = 0.9993, respectively). No adverse events were noted with the generic product. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between the brand-name and generic clozapine groups with regard to WBC count, dosage, and adverse events. The conversion to the generic product is projected to save the pharmacy $90,000 annually.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. Paton
Generic clozapine: outcomes after switching formulations
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 189(2): 184 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. A. ALVAREZ, C. MASCARENAS, and I. TIMMERMAN
Increasing Psychosis in a Patient Switched From Clozaril to Generic Clozapine
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 163(4): 746 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
E. H Makela, W. D Cutlip II, J. M Stevenson, J. M Weimer, E. S Abdallah, R. S Akhtar, A. S Aboraya, and E. Gunel
Branded versus Generic Clozapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2003; 37(3): 350 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2001 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.