The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 682-686. DOI 10.1345/aph.10317
© 2001 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, P
Right arrow Articles by Welter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, P
Right arrow Articles by Welter, K.


Research Articles

Medicaid's beta 2-agonist recipients and their treatment by national standards

P Reddy, Kelly ET 3rd, ME Kophazi, EA Geary, JD Markelon, and KJ Welter

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Connecticut's Medicaid high-dose beta 2-agonists (HDB) users (> 1 canister/mo) are receiving medications according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) asthma guidelines, and to compare healthcare utilization between HDB users and patients receiving no more than one canister of a short-acting beta 2-agonist per month. METHODS: All Connecticut Medicaid pharmacy claims from April to December 1998 were examined. Subjects were included if they had an asthma diagnosis and were excluded if they had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The percentage of HDB users not receiving long-term-control medication; receiving low doses of a long-term-control medication; and receiving oral, nebulized, or long-acting beta 2-agonists was determined. Healthcare utilization between HDB users and patients receiving no more than one canister of a short-acting beta 2-agonist per month was also compared. RESULTS: Of 1599 profiles included, 14% (n = 223) were HDB users. Twenty-five percent of these patients did not receive a long-term-control medication, and 35% received low doses of a long-term-control medication. Claims for oral, nebulized, and long-acting beta 2-agonists were submitted for 4%, 29%, and 22% of HDB users, respectively. More claims for short courses of oral corticosteroids were submitted for HDB users than for patients receiving no more than one canister of a short-acting beta 2-agonist per month (n = 1376) (1.99 +/- 3.60 vs. 0.39 +/- 1.07 mean +/- SD; p < 0.001). HDB users visited their physicians' offices an average of 4.72 +/- 24.08 times per month compared with an average of 2.40 +/- 14.4 office visits per month for patients receiving no more than one canister of a short-acting beta 2-agonist (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of Connecticut's Medicaid HDB users are not receiving medications according to NIH guidelines. HDB users were significantly more likely to receive short courses of oral corticosteroids and required significantly more office visits than patients receiving no more than one canister of a short-acting beta 2-agonist per month. Intervention programs designed to improve adherence to the guidelines will be developed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. I Coleman, P. Reddy, N M. Laster-Bradley, S. Dorval, B. Munagala, and C M. White
Effect of Practitioner Education on Adherence to Asthma Treatment Guidelines
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2003; 37(7): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2001 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.