The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1135. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A261
© 2001 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, G


Research Articles

Condoms and sexually transmitted diseases

G Rudd

Many of our patients and colleagues will be surprised and disturbed by the latest revelation from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). For more than a decade, the NIH and CDC have been promoting "safe sex," a message apparently based solely on the hope that condoms are effective in prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This hope was discredited in mid-July when the NIH released the "Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for STD Prevention," commissioned in June 2000 by then-House member, Dr. Tom Coburn (R-OK). The report disclosed that the body of medical research shows no evidence that condoms protect against most STDs. I refer to the NIH and CDC's "hope" because their recommendations have not been based on good science, but rather on theoretical models, possibly unduly influenced by a strong bias that condoms would prove to be effective.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2001 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.