The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1525-1531. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A434
© 2002 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warkentin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Marra, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warkentin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Marra, F


Research Articles

Valacyclovir versus acyclovir for HSV prophylaxisin neutropenic patients

DI Warkentin, JB Epstein, LM Campbell, JG Yip, VC Cox, A Ransier, MJ Barnett, and F Marra

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to administer acyclovir as prophylaxis to patients with hematologic malignancies during neutropenia; however, effective therapy requires frequent dosing, which is difficult in this setting. Valacyclovir has greater oral bioavailability and requires less frequent dosing. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir compared with acyclovir. METHODS: Patients who had been treated with chemotherapy or stem-cell transplantation were randomized to receive acyclovir 400 mg orally 3 times daily (n = 51), valacyclovir 500 mg orally twice daily (n = 48), or valacyclovir 250 mg orally twice daily (n = 52) during neutropenia. RESULTS: Clinical success, defined as the absence of an active herpes simplex virus (HSV) lesion or asymptomatic viral shedding, was similar between the 3 groups (acyclovir 96%, valacyclovir 500 mg 95%, valacyclovir 250 mg 100%). The overall rates of adverse events were similar in the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir is an effective and safe alternative to acyclovir for the prevention of HSV reactivation in patients with hematologic malignancies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Sandherr, H. Einsele, H. Hebart, C. Kahl, W. Kern, M. Kiehl, G. Massenkeil, O. Penack, X. Schiel, S. Schuettrumpf, et al.
Antiviral prophylaxis in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours: Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1051 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. W. Redding
Cancer Therapy-Related Oral Mucositis
J Dent Educ., August 1, 2005; 69(8): 919 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2002 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.