The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 280-287. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A118
© 2002 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, G.


Research Articles

Viral load as a surrogate end point in HIV disease

CL Smith and GE Stein

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of viral load as a surrogate end point for HIV disease progression and death. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted for the years 1990-March 2001. In addition, relevant articles were cross-referenced to screen for additional information. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding the validity of viral load as a surrogate end point for disease progression or death are cited. Emphasis was placed on randomized, controlled trials, but descriptive studies are also included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Recently, viral load has emerged as an important biomarker for monitoring HIV disease and antiretroviral therapy. Both baseline viral load and changes in viral load with time predict HIV disease progression and death. In fact, disease progression increases consistently once viral load exceeds 10,000 copies/mL, and AIDS and death primarily occur in patients with viral loads > 100,000 copies/mL. Changes that occur in viral load after initiation of antiretroviral therapy, however, do not fully explain the entire treatment effect. Also, separate comparisons of antiretroviral regimens may demonstrate similar differences in viral load changes but not similar differences in disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Viral load is an important monitoring parameter for HIV disease and antiretroviral therapy. However, changes in viral load do not explain the entire clinical improvement that occurs after initiation of therapy. Although viral load is a clinically important surrogate end point for HIV disease, it cannot fully account for all associated treatment effects.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2002 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.