The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 831-834. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A354
© 2002 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, H
Right arrow Articles by Yamaji, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, H
Right arrow Articles by Yamaji, A


Research Articles

Probable metabolic interaction of doxifluridine with phenytoin

H Konishi, K Morita, T Minouchi, M Nakajima, M Matsuda, and A Yamaji

OBJECTIVE: To report the marked elevation of the serum phenytoin concentration during treatment with antineoplastic agents. CASE SUMMARY: A 51-year-old Japanese woman, who was diagnosed with multiple brain metastatic tumors, was placed on oral phenytoin at a maintenance dose of 200 mg/d (3.8 mg/kg/d) to prevent seizures. The serum concentration of phenytoin was well controlled within the therapeutic range; no seizures occurred. Four months later, combination therapy with doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) 800 mg/d, cyclophosphamide 100 mg/d, and medroxyprogesterone acetate 800 mg/d was initiated because of further metastasis. Approximately 1 month after the start of concurrent treatment with the antineoplastic agents, the serum phenytoin concentration was elevated to fourfold of the original concentration. Staggering was observed at that time, but toxic symptoms gradually subsided with the decline in the serum phenytoin concentration after its withdrawal. DISCUSSION: A probable explanation for the marked elevation of serum phenytoin concentration is a reduction of the capacity of CYP2C-dependent phenytoin metabolism, and the antineoplastic agents could be involved in this event. The interaction of fluorouracil and phenytoin is known in clinical practice, and it is reported that the expression of hepatic CYP2C enzymes is depressed by exposure of rats to fluorouracil. 5'-DFUR, a prodrug of fluorouracil, was considered the likeliest candidate responsible for the interaction. This interaction was of clinical significance because of the great extent of changes in the serum phenytoin concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the elevation of serum phenytoin concentrations when phenytoin is given in combination with fluorouracil derivatives, including 5'-DFUR.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2002 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.