The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 1383-1386. DOI 10.1345/aph.1C052
© 2002 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ofotokun, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ofotokun, I


Research Articles

Treatment of azole-resistant oropharyngeal candidiasis with topical amphotericin B

SA Grim, KM Smith, F Romanelli, and I Ofotokun

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of successful treatment of azole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis with topical amphotericin B. CASE SUMMARY: A 30-year-old white woman presented with recurrent oral thrush. The patient had been exposed to azole antifungals for >20 years, and in vitro susceptibility tests revealed class resistance. The patient started taking amphotericin B 100 mg oral suspension swish-and-spit 4 times daily. After 4 weeks of topical amphotericin B treatment, the patient reported significant symptomatic improvement. The oral candidiasis worsened following a course of oral antibiotics, but improved once the antibiotic was discontinued and after receiving amphotericin B swish-and-swallow for 4 additional weeks. DISCUSSION: Current Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines include topical amphotericin B as a potentially effective option for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis. There is limited evidence to support this recommendation. Besides lack of data, an appropriate dosing regimen and consistent means of product formulation need to be determined. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates the potential role for topical amphotericin B in the treatment of azole-refractory oral candidiasis. Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials are needed to define dosing, efficacy, administration, and long-term safety of oral amphotericin B.





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2002 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.