The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 136-142. DOI 10.1345/aph.1A487
© 2003 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow For Our Patients
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. S

Why Aren't Lower, Effective, OTC Doses Available Earlier by Prescription?

Jay S Cohen, MD

Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Reprints: Jay S Cohen MD, 2658 Del Mar Heights Rd., #120, Del Mar, CA 92014-3110, FAX 858/509-8944, E-mail jacohen{at}ucsd.edu

BACKGROUND: Many popular oral over-the-counter (OTC) drugs were originally available only by prescription, but not at the low doses contained in their OTC counterparts. Yet, if OTC doses are effective for treating mild symptoms, why weren't these low, often safer doses made available at least by prescription when the drugs were first approved?

OBJECTIVE: To examine issues surrounding the delayed approval of OTC doses by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

METHODS: Information reviewed included package inserts, data obtained from manufacturers, and articles published in MEDLINE (1966 to December 2001). Medications examined included presently available and potentially approved OTC antiinflammatory, gastrointestinal, and antihistamine drugs.

RESULTS: Considerable data demonstrate the effectiveness of ibuprofen, naproxen, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine, diphenhydramine, and clemastine at OTC doses. Published studies also show the effectiveness of celecoxib, omeprazole, and fexofenadine at doses 33–50% lower than currently recommended for prescription use.

CONCLUSIONS: OTC doses are effective for many patients with mild symptoms and for some with serious symptoms. However, OTC-like doses are usually not offered when drugs are approved for prescription use because new drugs are usually studied in patients with serious conditions requiring higher doses; manufacturers and the FDA seem to prefer a middle-dose approach; >75% of subjects in premarketing dose studies are male; and averaging the responses of study subjects may obscure a wide range of interindividual variation in drug response. Simplistic dosage guidelines make therapeutic decisions easier. Because dose-related adverse effects frequently diminish quality-of-life and reduce adherence, the early availability of OTC-like doses, at least by prescription, would allow healthcare professionals greater flexibility in matching medication doses to patients' widely differing needs.

Key Words: over-the-counter doses

www.theannals.com, DOI


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Kim, C. Martin, J. Galanko, J. T. Woosley, J. C. Schroeder, T. O. Keku, J. A. Satia, S. Halabi, and R. S. Sandler
Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and Distal Large Bowel Cancer in Whites and African Americans
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 21, 2008; (2008) kwn255v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2003 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.