|
|
||||||||||
Assistant Professor in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacovigilance Center, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier
Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacy Department, Lapeyronie Hospital; College of Pharmacy, Montpellier
Lecturer in Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Center, Lapeyronie Hospital
Professor of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gui de Chauliac Hospital
Reprints: Hélène Peyriere PharmD PhD, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Toxicologie, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France, FAX 33-4-67-33-67-51, h-peyriere{at}chu-montpellier.fr
OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence of and reasons for discontinuation of abacavir within the first 6 months of therapy.
METHODS: Retrospective study performed in the cohort of
HIV-infected adults who started abacavir in a medical unit between 1997 and
December 2000. All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (especially hypersensitivity)
observed in this cohort were reported. The association between drugs and
complications were evaluated, using the French method to assess unexpected and
toxic drug reactions. According to the variables studied, statistical analysis
was performed using the
2 test, Fisher's exact test,
MannWhitney, Wilcoxon, or KruskalWallis tests.
RESULTS: All 331 patients treated with abacavir during this time period were included in this study. Early discontinuation of abacavir was observed in 34.1% of patients, the main reasons being adverse effects (20.8%), virologic failure (3.3%), drug holidays (2.7%), poor adherence (2.7%), and death (1.8%). Adverse effects were mostly represented by hypersensitivity reactions. After retrospective analysis, abacavir was stopped for likely hypersensitivity in 8.5% of patients, for doubtful hypersensitivity in 4.2%, and for other adverse effects in 8.1% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that abacavir is mainly stopped during the first 6 months of therapy for ADRs. The rate of likely hypersensitivity reaction observed in this study (8.5%) is higher than that observed in clinical trials (5%). After retrospective evaluation, the causality assessment of abacavir is not always certain.
Key Words: abacavir, early discontinuation, hypersensitivity reaction
Published Online, July 17, 2003. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1C523
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Lucas, D. Nolan, and S. Mallal HLA-B*5701 screening for susceptibility to abacavir hypersensitivity J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2007; 59(4): 591 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Martin, D. Nolan, S. Gaudieri, C. A. Almeida, R. Nolan, I. James, F. Carvalho, E. Phillips, F. T. Christiansen, A. W. Purcell, et al. Predisposition to abacavir hypersensitivity conferred by HLA-B*5701 and a haplotypic Hsp70-Hom variant PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4180 - 4185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Parra-Ruiz, M. Martinez-Ramirez, L. Munoz-Medina, C. Serrano-Falcon, and J. Hernandez-Quero Comment: reasons for early abacavir discontinuation in HIV-infected patients Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2004; 38(3): 512 - 513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||