|
|
||||||||||
Pharmacotherapy Specialist, Internal Medicine, Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH; Associate Professor of Clinical Pharmacology in Internal Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, OH
Associate Director, Internal Medicine Center of Akron, Akron; Associate Professor of Clinical Internal Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Reprints: Lawrence A Frazee PharmD, Akron General Medical Center, 400 Wabash Ave., Akron, OH 44307-2463, FAX 330/996-2395, lfrazee{at}agmc.org
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature investigating the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy following a first event of idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE).
DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE (1967-April 2003) and bibliographic searches of the English-language literature pertaining to the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy following a first event of idiopathic VTE was conducted. Search terms included venous thromboembolism, anticoagulation, duration of treatment, warfarin, and idiopathic.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: The results of all trials and meta-analyses that were obtained are reviewed and critiqued.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The risk of recurrent VTE following a first idiopathic event is similar to the risk in patients with a permanent risk factor. Conventional-intensity oral anticoagulant therapy reduces this risk by 80-90%, but at an annual risk of bleeding of approximately 2-3%. According to the PREVENT trial, low-intensity anticoagulation also affords protection against VTE recurrence, but at a lower risk of bleeding. Older trials indicated that longer therapy was superior to shorter therapy; however, data from recent trials have demonstrated that the benefit was maintained only while receiving therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a first episode of idiopathic proximal VTE should be considered for indefinite anticoagulant therapy. The appropriate intensity of anticoagulation is still controversial; however, it appears that low-intensity treatment would be appropriate in most patients. For patients who will not continue therapy indefinitely, there does not appear to be any long-term benefit to extending the duration of therapy from 3 to 6 months.
Key Words: anticoagulation, duration of therapy, idiopathic venous thromboembolism, warfarin
Published Online, August 29, 2003. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1C486
THIS ARTICLE IS APPROVED FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT
ACPE UNIVERSAL PROGRAM NUMBER: 407-000-03-031-H01
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Haspel, K. Bauer, A. Goehler, and D. H. Roberts Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy for Idiopathic Pulmonary Embolism in the Elderly: A Decision Analysis Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1243 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A 'Chris' Delaney and S. Suissa The case-crossover study design in pharmacoepidemiology Statistical Methods in Medical Research, February 1, 2009; 18(1): 53 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||