|
|
||||||||||
Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
Lead Pharmacoeconomist, Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Cambridge, MA
Health Outcomes Scientist, ACS State Healthcare, Atlanta, GA; Affiliate Assistant Professor, Pharmacy Care Systems, School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Health Program Supervisor, Department of Social Services, Hartford, CT
Lead Programmer, Health Information Designs, Auburn, AL
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs; Director, Clinical Pharmacology Research, Hartford Hospital, Hartford
Reprints: Prabashni Reddy PharmD, Abt Associates Clinical Trials, 55 Wheeler St., Cambridge, MA 02138-1168, FAX 617/868-2221, E-mail prabashni_reddy{at}abtassoc.com
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a letter-based intervention program submitted to prescribers and pharmacists would improve drug therapy in users of high-dose ß2-agonists (HDBs).
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective drug utilization review.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The intervention group consisted of 135 asthmatic patients (identified through ICD-9-CM codes) in the Connecticut Medicaid Program who submitted >1 claim per month for short-acting ß2-agonists (over a 6-mo period). Patient-specific intervention packets were mailed to the patients' prescribers and pharmacists, and their use of long-term control agents and healthcare utilization was evaluated over 6 months. These variables were compared with a comparison group (n = 510) of asthmatics drawn from the same Medicaid program who were not considered to be high-dose users of short-acting ß2-agonists at baseline.
RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, the intervention group used fewer long-term asthma control agents as compared with the comparison group (58% vs. 96%; p < 0.001); there was no significant difference after the intervention program (65% vs. 71%; p = 0.169). The acquisition of spacers was greater in the intervention group than in the control group after the intervention (7% vs. 2%; p = 0.007). At the end of the 6-month intervention period, 46% of patients in the intervention group were no longer HDB users (p < 0.001). The higher frequency of prescriber office visits in the intervention group than the comparison group before the intervention (0.46 ± 0.82 vs. 0.25 ± 0.66; p < 0.001) was not evident after the intervention program (0.24 ± 0.63 vs. 0.18 ± 0.60; p = 0.283).
CONCLUSIONS: This intervention program had modest impact on improving the use of long-term control agents and reducing prescriber office visits.
Key Words: asthma, ß2-agonist use, drug utilization review, treatment guidelines
Published Online, June 10, 2003. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1C506