|
|
||||||||||
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Associate Director of Residency Training, Creighton University/University of Nebraska; Staff Psychiatrist, Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Omaha Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Omaha, NE
PGY4 Psychiatry Resident, Creighton University/University of Nebraska
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Creighton University
Research Coordinator, Omaha VA Medical Center
Professor of Psychiatry and Chief of Mental Health, Omaha VA Medical Center
Clinical Instructor of Psychiatry, Brown University, Providence, RI
PGY2 Resident in Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska
PGY3 Resident in Psychiatry, Creighton University
Professor of Psychiatry and Vice Chairman, Creighton University Department of Psychiatry; Associate Chief of Staff and Chief of Research, Department of Mental Health and Behavior Science, Omaha VA Medical Center
Professor and Chair, Department of Psychiatry, Creighton University
Reprints: S Pirzada Sattar MD, Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Omaha VA Medical Center, 4101 Woolworth Ave. #116A, Omaha, NE 68105-1850, fax 402/449-0677, syed.sattar{at}med.va.gov
BACKGROUND: Over 1000 medications contain pork- and/or beef-derived gelatin and stearic acid as inert ingredients. Use of these medications in patients with religious beliefs against consumption of these ingredients might constitute an ethical conflict.
OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' and physicians' attitudes about using medications with religiously prohibited ingredients derived from pork and/or beef.
METHODS: In this pilot study, 100 patients and 100 physicians completed a survey designed to assess their knowledge and opinion on using medications that might contain inert ingredients derived from animals whose consumption offends followers of certain religions.
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients surveyed, most (84%) reported that they were not aware that several medications contained ingredients derived from pork and/or beef. About 63% of the patients wanted their physicians, and 35% of the patients wanted their non-physician healthcare providers (pharmacists, nurses), to inform them when using such medications. Thirteen percent of the patients shared religious reasons for not consuming pork and/or beef products. Approximately 70% of physicians were unaware that several medications contain ingredients that might be against their patients' religion, and most (70%) thought that it was important to inform their patients if such drugs were prescribed.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that both patients and physicians think that patients should be informed whenever medications that contain pork- and/or beef-derived products are prescribed. The use of medications with these ingredients is an ethical issue. Informing patients about this issue promotes respect for their religious beliefs and may promote therapeutic alliance; therefore, this might have public health implications and needs further research.
Key Words: adherence, culture, ethics, gelatin, informed consent, religion, stearic acid
Published Online, October 12, 2004. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E001
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. A. Khokhar, I. Hameed, M. M. Ali, J. Sadiq, and P. Bowie To trust or not to trust? Faith issues in psychopharmacological prescribing Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2008; 32(5): 179 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Easterbrook and G. Maddern Porcine and Bovine Surgical Products: Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu Perspectives Arch Surg, April 1, 2008; 143(4): 366 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Khokhar, M. M. Ali, I. Hameed, and J. Sadiq Psychotropic medication: resistance, adherence and religious objections Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 78 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||