|
|
||||||||||
Assistant Professor of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami
Professor of Epidemiology, University of Miami
Epidemiologist, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati
Professor of Pathology and Immunology, Department of Pathology and Surgery, University of Miami
Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami
Research Assistant of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami
Hepatology Fellow, Department of Medicine, University of Miami
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami
Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami
Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami
Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami
Reprints: Guy W Neff MD, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, MSB Room 6560, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0595, fax 513/558-1744, Guy.Neff{at}uc.edu
BACKGROUND: Resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains develop in 30% of liver transplant recipients treated with lamivudine within 2 years from the time of transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and outcomes of tenofovir salvage therapy for patients with lamivudine resistance in a retrospective cohort of liver-transplanted patients.
METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively evaluated for patients who received tenofovir. Data collected included demographics, HBV serologic information prior to and during tenofovir therapy, drug-related complications, and creatinine clearance. Criteria for lamivudine resistance included elevation of liver chemistries along with reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis Be antigen, and/or HBV DNA.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients showed resistance to lamivudine at 1085 months (median 26) following liver transplantation. Tenofovir 300 mg/day orally was added in 8 patients 166 months after the development of viral lamivudine resistance and continued for 1426 months (median 19.3). All 8 patients experienced HBV DNA viral suppression, with 7 currently nondetectable. No adverse events were reported, and creatinine clearance was not impaired.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tenofovir safely and markedly decreases replication of lamivudine-resistant HBV variants after liver transplantation and is another potential option for the treatment of HBV lamivudine resistance.
Key Words: adefovir, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, lamivudine, liver transplantation, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Published Online, October 26, 2004. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E280
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Riediger, P. O. Berberat, P. Sauer, D. Gotthardt, K. H. Weiss, A. Mehrabi, U. Merle, W. Stremmel, and J. Encke Prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(suppl_8): viii37 - viii46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||