QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Résumé Extracto Full Text PDF Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Articles Ahead of Print [Order Reprint] Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rutter, P. M Articles by Brown, D. T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rutter, P. M Articles by Brown, D. T

Evaluation of Community Pharmacists' Recommendations to Standardized Patient Scenarios

Senior Lecturer, Pharmacy Practice Division, St. Michael's Building, Portsmouth, England

Emma Horsley, MPharm MRPharmS

Final year MPharm Undergraduate, Pharmacy Practice Division, St. Michael's Building

David T Brown, PhD MRPharmS

Principal Lecturer and Divisional Leader, Pharmacy Practice Division, St. Michael's Building

Reprints: Paul M Rutter PhD MRPharmS, Pharmacy Practice Division, St. Michael's Building, White Swan Rd., Portsmouth, PO1 2DT, United Kingdom, fax 02392 843565, paul.rutter{at}port.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: Recent trends in the global nonprescription drug market show a massive increase in medicine availability to the general public. This places greater responsibility on community pharmacists to ensure that patients exercise self-care appropriately. This small study examined pharmacist performance in facilitating patient self-care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an appropriate course of action was taken by UK community pharmacists practicing in one geographic area when presented with 1 of 2 case scenarios: headache or abdominal pain.

METHODS: A covert researcher, posing as a patient, spoke with the pharmacist on duty at each of 30 pharmacies, asking for advice on one of the scenarios. The pharmacist was interviewed and their responses were examined by an expert panel.

RESULTS: Thirty pharmacies were visited resulting in 28 consultations, 14 each for both scenarios. Pharmacists performed better when counseling the "patient" with abdominal pain than headache. The majority of questions asked were categorized as being relevant by the panel (66% for headache, 89% for abdominal pain), although in both scenarios, the expected outcome of referral was observed only in 7 of the consultations for headache and in 8 cases for abdominal pain. Questioning centered on quantification and clarification of the presenting problem and rarely on questions related to history taking.

CONCLUSIONS: Performance levels of the community pharmacists varied considerably. For all pharmacists to perform well, greater emphasis should be placed on eliciting information from the patient to ensure that the appropriate course of action is taken.

Key Words: community pharmacy, nonprescription medicines, United Kingdom

Published Online, April 27, 2004. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1D519

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C Watson, J. A Cleland, and C. M Bond Simulated patient visits with immediate feedback to improve the supply of over-the-counter medicines: a feasibility study Fam. Pract., December 1, 2009; 26(6): 532 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Alte, W. Weitschies, and C. A Ritter Evaluation of Consultation in Community Pharmacies with Mystery Shoppers Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2007; 41(6): 1023 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M C Watson, C M Bond, M Johnston, and K Mearns Using human error theory to explore the supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies. Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 244 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Vacca, J. Orozco, A. Figueras, and D. Capella Assessment of Risks Related to Medicine Dispensing by Nonprofessionals in Colombia: Clinical Case Simulations Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]