The Annals New | Pharmaco Epidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 23 November 2004, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E224.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 194-197. DOI 10.1345/aph.1E224
© 2005 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lexchin, J. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lexchin, J. R

Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry Funding on Clinical Research

Joel R Lexchin, MD

Associate Professor, School of Health Policy and Management, York University; Emergency Department, University Health Network; Associate Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 121 Walmer Rd., Toronto, Ontario M5R 2X8, Canada, fax 416/736-5227, jlexchin{at}yorku.ca

Reprints: Dr. Lexchin

This commentary explores the influence of industry funding and offers suggestions for overcoming some of the problems. First, it is difficult to obtain funding from some sources for research with limited commercial value. Second, lack of communication among researchers can impede scientific progress. Stopping research before meaningful results are available is another area of concern. Next, suppressed or delayed publication of data may bias the results of meta-analyses, resulting in incorrect risk–benefit profiles for drugs. Finally, commercially funded clinical research is more likely to yield positive results than when funding comes from other sources. Possible solutions are explored.

Published Online, October 23, 2004. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E224


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
M Doucet and S Sismondo
Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2008; 34(8): 627 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
J. Goven
Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification
Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2006; 31(5): 565 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. E. Nissen and President, American College of Cardiology
President's Page: American College of Cardiology Fellowship: Where Ideals and Personal Responsibility Intersect
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1901 - 1903.
[Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2005 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.