The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 21 December 2004, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E321.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 243-248. DOI 10.1345/aph.1E321
© 2005 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summers, K. M
Right arrow Articles by Brock, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Summers, K. M
Right arrow Articles by Brock, T. P.

AMBULATORY CARE

Impact of Pharmacist-Led Community Bone Mineral Density Screenings

Kelly M Summers, PharmD

Adult Internal Medicine Pharmacy Resident, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center; Clinical Instructor, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

Tina Penick Brock, MS Pharm EdD

Clinical Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Reprints: Dr. Summers, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Smith Bldg., Rm. 351, 410 N. 12th St., PO Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298-0533, fax 804/828-8359, ksummers{at}vcu.edu

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis-associated fractures burden both individuals and the overall healthcare system. Bone mineral density (BMD) screening remains the gold standard measure for identifying patients at risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of convenient, pharmacist-led BMD screening and counseling sessions on identification and education of patients at risk for or with osteoporosis.

METHODS: Nonpregnant persons >18 years of age were eligible for enrollment in this descriptive study. At an urban retail pharmacy, participants underwent risk factor assessment, peripheral BMD scanning, and personalized counseling. At 3 and 6 months after screening, subjects were questioned by telephone regarding any subsequent primary care provider (PCP) interactions, as well as any behaviors initiated and/or medications modified.

RESULTS: Of the 102 subjects screened, 22.6% and 11.7% were identified as being at medium risk (T score –1.0 to –2.5) and high risk (T score –2.5 or less) for osteoporosis, respectively. By 6 months, 42.5% of the participants reported increasing their dietary intake of calcium, 29.3% began or increased calcium supplements, and 54.9% positively modified smoking status, exercise level, alcohol consumption, or caffeine intake. Additionally, 24 of 52 subjects who had discussed their results with a PCP by 6 months also received a treatment recommendation. Eighty-nine participants reported the community location increased their likelihood of receiving a BMD scan.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, pharmacist-led BMD screenings that include individualized counseling sessions appear convenient, accessible, and beneficial for patients. With the establishment of clinical benefit of and positive reception to such screenings, pharmacists can now look toward securing consistent reimbursement for this vital pharmaceutical care service.

Key Words: bone mineral density, community bone mineral density screening, osteoporosis

Published Online, December 21, 2004. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E321


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. R. French, F. Vernace-Inserra, and G. A. Hawker
A Prospective Study to Identify Factors Affecting Adherence to Recommended Daily Calcium Intake in Women with Low Bone Mineral Density
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. M. McLeod, S. E. McCann, P. J. Horvath, and J. Wactawski-Wende
Predictors of Change in Calcium Intake in Postmenopausal Women after Osteoporosis Screening
J. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 137(8): 1968 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. T Gold, I. M Alexander, and M. P Ettinger
How Can Osteoporosis Patients Benefit More from Their Therapy? Adherence Issues with Bisphosphonate Therapy
Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2006; 40(6): 1143 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. Naunton, G. M Peterson, and G. Jones
Pharmacist-Provided Quantitative Heel Ultrasound Screening for Rural Women at Risk of Osteoporosis
Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2005 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.