The Annals Holiday Offer - Save 50%
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published Online, 7 June 2005, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E629.
 The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 1220-1226. DOI 10.1345/aph.1E629
© 2005 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puumalainen, I. I
Right arrow Articles by Airaksinen, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puumalainen, I. I
Right arrow Articles by Airaksinen, M. S

AMBULATORY CARE

Quality Assurance Instrument Focusing on Patient Counseling

Inka I Puumalainen, MSc (Pharm)

Researcher, Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Kuopio, Helsinki, Finland

Johanna M Kause, MSc (Pharm)

Expert, Association of Finnish Pharmacies, Helsinki

Marja S Airaksinen, PhD

Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki

Reprints: Dr. Puumalainen, Uudenmaankatu 19-21 C 57, 00120 Helsinki, Finland, fax 358 17 162 515, inka.puumalainen{at}uku.fi

BACKGROUND: Patient counseling is a professional service provided by community pharmacists. To assess the quality of these services, specific quality assurance instruments are needed.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a validated, easy-to-use patient counseling quality assurance instrument for community pharmacists. The development process was part of a national project to enhance patient counseling in community pharmacies (TIPPA 2000-2003).

METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used with 2 expert panels: Panel 1, consisting of experienced pharmacy practitioners (n = 10), and Panel 2, consisting of academic and professional experts (n = 10). The final consensus was assessed by a Delphi questionnaire round involving both panels, the employers of Panel 1 members (n = 5), and the members of the executive board of the TIPPA project (n = 10), comprising 35 people (response rate 74%; n = 26).

RESULTS: The first Delphi round yielded a high consensus, with the level of agreement varying between 69% and 100%. All but one item met the predefined criteria for approval. A total of 16 indicators were identified in 3 quality dimensions: patient (4 indicators), process (6), and learning and innovations (6). Strategy and vision of the pharmacy in patient counseling formed the core of the instrument.

CONCLUSIONS: The modified Delphi method proved to be applicable in the development process of an instrument assessing patient counseling services. The instrument comprehensively takes into account factors related to quality assurance of counseling practices.

Key Words: community pharmacy, patient counseling: consensus methods, quality assurance

Published Online, June 7, 2005. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1E629


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J S. Bell, M. Vaananen, H. Ovaskainen, U. Narhi, and M. S Airaksinen
Providing Patient Care in Community Pharmacies: Practice and Research in Finland
Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2007; 41(6): 1039 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2005 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.