The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 13 December 2005, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1G282.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 45-48. DOI 10.1345/aph.1G282
© 2006 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moser, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Rhule, F J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moser, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Rhule, F J.

GASTROENTEROLOGY

No More Than Necessary: Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Promethazine

Joseph D Moser, MD

Vice President for Medical Affairs, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD

James B Caldwell, PharmD

Pharmacy Director, Anne Arundel Medical Center

F Jane Rhule, RN CPHQ

Outcomes Analyst, Anne Arundel Medical Center

Reprints: Dr. Moser, Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy., Annapolis, MD 21401-3019, fax 443/481-1313, jdmoser{at}aahs.org

BACKGROUND: Limitations in antiemetic options have resulted in increased use of intravenous promethazine. However, this drug has significant sedative effects with its standard dosage of 25 mg, especially when used in conjunction with narcotic analgesics. While studies have revealed the bioavailability of enteric promethazine to be 25%, current dosing references suggest identical dosing regardless of the route of administration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiemetic efficacy and sedative effects of low-dose intravenous promethazine (6.25 or 12.5 mg) with intravenous ondansetron 4 mg.

METHODS: We assessed inpatients with noncritical conditions at Anne Arundel Medical Center who were treated for nausea or vomiting from any cause except chemotherapy or pregnancy. Forty-six patients received low-dose promethazine and 41 received ondansetron. Statistical analysis was carried out for significant differences in efficacy and sedation.

RESULTS: For patients who received intravenous promethazine 6.25 or 12.5 mg, nausea and vomiting were relieved at one hour in 74% and 68%, respectively, compared with 59% for intravenous ondansetron 4 mg. Results at 3 hours were 67% and 80% for promethazine and 71% for ondansetron. Median sedation scores at one hour were equal at 3 for promethazine and ondansetron (4 = fully awake); at 3 hours, the median scores were 4 and 3.5, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among any of these results.

CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose (6.25 mg) intravenous promethazine relieves nausea and vomiting as effectively as intravenous ondansetron 4 mg.

Key Words: bioavailability, dosing, promethazine

Published Online, December 13, 2005. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1G282





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2006 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.