|
|
|
||||||||||
Psychiatric Pharmacy Practice Resident/MS Student, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin
Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy and Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Professor, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin
Reprints: Dr. Bettinger, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station MC#A1910, Austin, TX 78712-0124, fax 512/471-3756, bettinger{at}mail.utexas.edu
OBJECTIVE: To identify, review, and analyze studies comparing atomoxetine with psychostimulants with the intent of determining the role of atomoxetine in the pharmacologic management of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
DATA SOURCES: Primary, review, and meta-analysis articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-December 2005). MeSH headings used in the search include: attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, ADHD, atomoxetine, stimulants, psychostimulants, methylphenidate, and amphetamine salts. Relevant data presented at professional meetings that we attended were also identified.
STUDY SELECTION AND EXTRACTION: All clinical studies comparing atomoxetine with psychostimulants, regardless of study design, were evaluated. Relevant efficacy and safety data from these studies were included in the discussion.
DATA SYNTHESIS: At time of writing, 5 head-to-head trials had compared psychostimulants and atomoxetine in the treatment of ADHD. No significant difference between atomoxetine and methylphenidate immediate-release were found on the ADHD Rating Scale total score. Osmotic oral release system (OROS) methylphenidate showed significantly greater improvement at weeks 1 and 2, and significantly more patients treated with OROS methylphenidate were classified as responders. Patients on both atomoxetine and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR) showed significant improvements at endpoint over baseline; however, Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) scores were significantly better with MAS XR. Tolerability was similar between atomoxetine and stimulant medications.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, psychostimulants are regarded as first-line pharmacologic treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD, as the efficacy and safety of these agents have been well established based on clinical trials and extensive naturalistic use. Adverse effects in some patients and abuse potential have led to the search for new treatments. Atomoxetine represents an alternative treatment for ADHD and is unlikely to be associated with abuse; however, long-term safety data are needed to further establish its place in therapy.
Key Words: ADHD, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, psychostimulants, stimulants
Published Online, May 30, 2006. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1G582
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. M. Conklin, J. Lawford, B. W. Jasper, E. B. Morris, S. C. Howard, S. W. Ogg, S. Wu, X. Xiong, and R. B. Khan Side Effects of Methylphenidate in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 226 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Conklin, S. Helton, J. Ashford, R. K. Mulhern, W. E. Reddick, R. Brown, M. Bonner, B. W. Jasper, S. Wu, X. Xiong, et al. Predicting Methylphenidate Response in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 22, 2009; (2009) jsp044v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V A Harpin Medication options when treating children and adolescents with ADHD: interpreting the NICE guidance 2006 Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., April 1, 2008; 93(2): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Sherwood and J. A. Rey Pharmacological Agents for the Treatment of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Review of the Literature Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2006; 19(6): 336 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||