|
|
|
||||||||||
Reader in Psychiatry, Clinical Neuroscience Division, University Department of Mental Health, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, England
Senior Specialist, International Safety and Pharmacovigilance, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
Head of Department, International Safety and Pharmacovigilance, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen
Senior Scientific Advisor, Mood Disorders, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen
Reprints: Dr. Baldwin, University Department of Mental Health, Royal South Hants Hospital, Graham Road, Southampton, SO14 0YG, UK, fax 44 (0) 2380 234243, dsb1{at}soton.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that escitalopram is efficacious in a range of mood and anxiety disorders, but the individual trials are insufficiently large to allow a full exploration of its tolerability.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability and safety of escitalopram through analysis of all randomized controlled clinical trials in major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders.
METHODS: Analyses of tolerability were based on data from all available randomized, double-blind, controlled studies completed by December 2006 in which escitalopram was compared with placebo or active compounds (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine). Adverse events (AEs) that occurred more frequently with escitalopram than with placebo were listed, and tolerability and safety were evaluated.
RESULTS: Nausea was the only AE with an incidence greater than or
equal to 10% and 5 percentage points greater than with placebo during
short-term treatment. In general, AEs were mild to moderate in severity. AEs
related to sexual dysfunction were similarly frequent with escitalopram and
citalopram, but were higher with paroxetine. No suicide occurred among
escitalopram-treated patients, and there were no significant differences
between escitalopram and placebo in incidence of suicidal behavior, measured
by self-harm and suicidal thoughts. The 8 week withdrawal rate due to AEs was
higher with escitalopram than with placebo (7.3% vs 2.8%; p < 0.001) but
lower than with paroxetine (6.6% vs 9.0%; p < 0.01) or venlafaxine (6.1% vs
13.2%; p < 0.01) (Fisher's Exact test, 2 tailed). Compared with paroxetine,
escitalopram resulted in significantly fewer discontinuation symptoms (average
increase in Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms Scale of 1.6 vs 3.9; p
< 0.01). There were no clinically relevant changes in clinical laboratory
values in patients treated with escitalopram. Mean weight change after 6
months of treatment with escitalopram (0.58 ± 2.63 kg) was similar to
that with placebo (0.15 ± 2.33 kg). The incidence of cardiovascular
events was similar to that with placebo. The risk of AEs was no higher in
special patient populations, such as the elderly (
65 y of age) or those
with hepatic dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on data from randomized controlled trials involving more than 4000 escitalopram-treated patients, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is safe and well tolerated in short- and long-term treatment.
Key Words: adverse events, escitalopram, tolerability
Published Online, September 11, 2007. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K089
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Anderson, I. Ferrier, R. Baldwin, P. Cowen, L Howard, G Lewis, K Matthews, R. McAllister-Williams, R. Peveler, J Scott, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2008; 22(4): 343 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||