|
|
||||||||||
Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY; Director, Clinical Research and Evaluation Facility, Nathan S Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY
Reader of Endocrinology & Metabolism, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
at time of writing, Neuroscience Outcomes Liaison, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; now, Senior Manager, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL
at time of writing, Senior Neuroscience Outcomes Liaison, Eli Lilly and Company; now, Regional Clinical Executive, Abbott Laboratories
Senior Medical Information Associate, Eli Lilly and Company
Associate Vice President, Clinical Research, Eli Lilly Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, New-foundland and Labrador, Canada
Clinical Research Scientist, Eli Lilly and Company
Reprints: Dr. Citrome, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, fax 845/398-5483, citrome{at}nki.rfmh.org
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been reported during antipsychotic treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the potential risk of treatment-emergent diabetes mellitus among patients receiving antipsychotic medications.
METHODS: The MEDLINE and Psychinfo databases were searched using the key words antipsychotic (including individual drug names), diabetes, risk, and incidence for all English-language articles published between 1966 and 2005. Risk calculations were performed using data obtained from pharmacoepidemiologic studies that met the following criteria: (1) cohort design, (2) determination of preexisting diabetes, (3) inclusion of antipsychotic monotherapy as an exposure variable, and (4) comparison with exposure to first-generation antipsychotics. Studies meeting these criteria were used to calculate incidence, attributable risk between agents, and number needed to harm.
RESULTS: A total of 25 observational pharmacoepidemiologic studies were found comparing antipsychotics on the outcome of diabetes mellitus. Sufficient information was provided in 15 of the reports to be able to estimate attributable risk. Attributable risk for individual second-generation antipsychotics relative to first-generation antipsychotics ranged from 53 more to 46 fewer new cases of diabetes per 1000 patients. Little observable difference was noted between the individual second-generation antipsychotics versus first-generation antipsychotics on this outcome. However, few of the studies controlled for body weight, race or ethnicity, or the presence of diabetogenic medications. None adjusted for familial history of diabetes, levels of physical activity, or diet, as this information is not usually available in the databases used in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the published pharmacoepidemiologic reports reviewed, the avoidance of diabetes as an outcome cannot be predictably achieved with precision by choice of a second-versus a first-generation antipsychotic. Risk management for new-onset diabetes requires the assessment of established risk factors such as family history, advancing age, non-white ethnicity, diet, central obesity, and level of physical activity.
Key Words: antipsychotic, diabetes, schizophrenia
Published Online, September 4, 2007. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K141
Related articles in The Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L Dufresne Weighing In: Emergent Diabetes Mellitus and Second-Generation Antipsychotics Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2007; 41(10): 1725 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||