The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 23 October 2007, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K296.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1986-1991. DOI 10.1345/aph.1K296
© 2007 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fong, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Devlin, J. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fong, J. J
Right arrow Articles by Devlin, J. W

CRITICAL CARE

Propofol Associated with a Shorter Duration of Mechanical Ventilation than Scheduled Intermittent Lorazepam: A Database Analysis Using Project IMPACT

Jeffrey J Fong, PharmD BCPS

Critical Care Pharmacy Fellow, School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Salmaan Kanji, PharmD

Critical Care Pharmacist, The Ottawa Hospital; Research Scientist, The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Joseph F Dasta, MSc FCCM FCCP

Adjunct Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Texas, Austin, TX; Professor Emeritus, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

Erik Garpestad, MD

Director, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Tufts–New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

John W Devlin, PharmD BCPS FCCM FCCP

Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University; Clinical Pharmacist, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Tufts–New England Medical Center

Reprints: Dr. Devlin, Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Mugar #206, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, fax 617/373-7655, j.devlin{at}neu.edu

BACKGROUND: While one prospective controlled study in medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients demonstrated that sedation with propofol leads to a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared with scheduled intermittent intravenous lorazepam, its conclusions may not be applicable to surgical ICU patients and institutions not using daily sedation interruption.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the duration of mechanical ventilation between medical and surgical ICU patients receiving propofol versus scheduled intermittent lorazepam in routine clinical practice.

METHODS: Retrospective data (January 2001–December 2005) were obtained from the Project IMPACT database for medical and surgical ICU patients at Tufts–New England Medical Center, a 450 bed academic hospital. These patients had been mechanically ventilated for 24 hours or more and had received 24 hours or more of either propofol or scheduled intermittent lorazepam as the sole sedative. Clinically relevant variables were identified a priori, and their influence on duration of mechanical ventilation was evaluated. Differences in these variables between propofol and scheduled intermittent lorazepam groups within the ICU cohorts were then measured.

RESULTS: Of 4608 database patients, 287 met criteria. Factors associated with a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation for the medical ICU cohort included sedation use for 5 or more days (OR 13.8; 95% CI 8.3 to 19.4), narcotic use (OR 7.6; 95% CI 2.3 to 13), and scheduled intermittent lorazepam use (OR 7.0; 95% CI 0.4 to 13.7). For the surgical ICU cohort, these factors included sedation use for 5 or more days (OR 15; 95% CI 11.4 to 19.4), APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score equal to or greater than 18 (OR 4.1; 95% CI 0.4 to 7.8), and scheduled intermittent lorazepam use (OR 4.0; 95% CI 0.2 to 7.7). Duration of mechanical ventilation was the only variable that differed significantly between propofol and scheduled intermittent lorazepam in both the medical ICU, with a median (range) of 6 (3–12) versus 11 (5–25; p = 0.03), and surgical ICU, with a median of 4 (2–15) versus 9 (4–20; p = 0.001), groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Sedation with propofol in the naturalistic setting appears to be associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared with scheduled intermittent lorazepam in both medial and surgical ICU patients when only one sedative drug is used. Data from this uncontrolled observational study are consistent with findings from a randomized clinical trial.

Key Words: critical care, lorazepam, propofol, sedation

Published Online, October 23, 2007. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K296





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2007 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.