|
|
|
||||||||||
Assistant Professor, Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus, Portland, OR
Data Analyst, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus
Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus
Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus
Coordinator for Medicaid-Related Programs, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center, Portland
Reprints: Dr. Hartung, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Oregon Health & Science University Campus, 3303 SW Bond Ave., Mail Code CH12C Portland, OR 97239, fax 503/494-1082, hartungd{at}ohsu.edu
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use and emerging safety concerns, data on the comparative safety and effectiveness of long-acting opioid (LAO) analgesics are weak.
OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of adverse events among patients newly prescribed an LAO.
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study using Medicaid administrative claims data was conducted examining time until first adverse outcome among patients with new prescriptions for methadone, extended-release (ER) oxycodone, ER morphine, or transdermal fentanyl. Adverse outcomes included emergency department (ED) encounters or hospitalizations for opioid-related adverse events, all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations, death, and diagnoses for opioid-related adverse effects. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for a variety of measured covariates overall and within subgroups of patients with and without cancer.
RESULTS: This study included 5684 subjects. Patients prescribed ER oxycodone were 35% less likely (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.77) to experience an ED or hospitalization involving an opioid-related adverse event, 23% lower risk of hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91), 41% lower risk of constipation (adjusted HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.00), and a 29% lower risk of death (adjusted HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.94) compared with those prescribed ER morphine. Among subjects with noncancer pain, fentanyl was associated with a higher risk of ED encounters (adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.59) and methadone was associated with a greater risk of overdose symptoms (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.40) compared with ER morphine.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support a modest safety advantage with ER oxycodone compared with ER morphine. Among subjects with noncancer pain, fentanyl and methadone were associated with an increased risk of an adverse event compared with ER morphine. Additional studies are needed to confirm our findings and further clarify risks associated with different LAOs.
Key Words: adverse effects, opioid analgesics, pharmacoepidemiology
Published Online, May 15, 2007. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K066
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Dunn, K. W. Saunders, C. M. Rutter, C. J. Banta-Green, J. O. Merrill, M. D. Sullivan, C. M. Weisner, M. J. Silverberg, C. I. Campbell, B. M. Psaty, et al. Opioid Prescriptions for Chronic Pain and Overdose: A Cohort Study Ann Intern Med, January 19, 2010; 152(2): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Z. Duan Two Commonly Used Methods for Exposure-Adverse Events Analysis: Comparisons and Evaluations J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2009; 49(5): 540 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||