The Annals Holiday Offer - Save 50%
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 9 September 2008, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L156.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 1586-1591. DOI 10.1345/aph.1L156
© 2008 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perrín, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by López, F. J G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perrín, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by López, F. J G.

HIV/AIDS

Incremental Drug Treatment Cost in HIV-Positive Patients in Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials

Rosario Santolaya Perrín, PharmD

Specialist in Hospital Pharmacy, Staff Pharmacist, Pharmacy Service, Hospital Central de Cruz Roja, Madrid, Spain

Fernando J García López, MD MHS PhD

Specialist in Nephrology, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid

Reprints: Dr. Santolaya Perrín, Pharmacy Service, Hospital Central de Cruz Roja, Avenida de Reina Victoria, 24, 28003 Madrid, Spain, fax 34 91 533 94 81, rsantolaya.hccruzr{at}salud.madrid.org

BACKGROUND: Drugs used in clinical trials supported by the pharmaceutical industry are supplied free of charge by the companies. However, maintenance of treatment with those drugs when the trials have finished can generate extra cost for patients who participated in the trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether HIV-infected patients' participation in clinical trials results in drug cost savings or increases.

METHODS: An analysis of all antiretrovirals dispensed to HIV-infected outpatients prior to, during, and after their participation in clinical trials in a university hospital during a 2-year period was conducted. Only patients who completed the trial during the study period were included. The following outcomes were measured: (1) cost saved (difference between cost per day during the trial and cost per day before study entry), (2) cost generated (difference between cost per day at the end of the trial and cost per day before study entry), (3) balance between cost saved and cost generated, and (4) number of days that a patient received a drug once the trial was finished to generate cost, considering costs saved. All data were extracted from the hospital pharmacy database. A stratified analysis by type of clinical trial (ordinary or expanded use) was undertaken.

RESULTS: Data from 61 patients were analyzed. The cost of drug therapy during patient participation in a clinical trial was lower than the cost prior to inclusion. Therefore, mean drug savings of $10.38 (US) per patient day resulted (95% CI –5.9 to 14.84). The mean cost generated was $8.74 per patient day (95% CI 3.95 to 13.52).

CONCLUSIONS: A patient's participation in a clinical trial or expanded-access clinical trial generated extra cost once the trial had finished because the cost of drug therapy was higher at the end of the study. In our study, the daily drug costs saved during the trial were similar to the daily drug costs generated.

Key Words: clinical trials, pharmacoeconomics, prescribing

Published Online, September 9, 2008. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L156





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2008 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.