|
|
|
||||||||||
Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Kansas; Assistant Director, Lipid, Atherosclerosis, Metabolic and LDL-Apheresis Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Preventive Cardiology Fellow, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT
Research Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Kansas
Professor and Vice-Chair, Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Kansas
Director of Cardiology—The Henry Low Heart Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT; Professor of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT
Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine; Director, Lipid, Atherosclerosis, Metabolic and LDL-Apheresis Center, University of Kansas Medical Center
Reprints: Dr. Backes, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Lipid, Atherosclerosis, Metabolic and LDL-Apheresis Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, fax 913/588-2355, jbackes{at}kumc.edu
BACKGROUND: Statins are generally well tolerated, but some patients discontinue therapy secondary to adverse effects. Dosing a statin (rosuvastatin) every other day (EOD) may provide significant lipoprotein changes while avoiding common adverse effects in this statin-intolerant population.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect and tolerance of EOD rosuvastatin in patients previously intolerant to statin therapy.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with EOD rosuvastatin at 2 lipid specialty clinics: the University of Kansas Lipid, Atherosclerosis, and LDL-Apheresis Center and the Hartford Hospital Cholesterol Management Center. Approximately 2600 charts were reviewed to identify patients receiving rosuvastatin EOD who previously had experienced statin intolerance. Fifty-one patients were eligible for the analysis, which evaluated changes in the lipid profile, the number achieving their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, and the percent tolerating rosuvastatin EOD. Laboratory data were assessed immediately prior to rosuvastatin EOD therapy and at the first follow-up.
RESULTS: Myalgias (76.5%) and increased transaminase levels (19.5%) were the most common causes of prior statin intolerance, but 72.5% (37/51) of patients were able to tolerate the EOD therapy (mean dose 5.6 mg) regimen for 4 ± 2.9 (mean ± SD) months. Mean LDL-C decreased 34.5% (p < 0.001) in the patients who tolerated the regimen, enabling approximately 50% to achieve their LDL-C goal. All patients who were considered to be intolerant to rosuvastatin EOD therapy (27.5%; 14/51) reexperienced the symptoms of their prior statin intolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating patients intolerant to statins with rosuvastatin EOD was tolerated by the majority of patients and reduced LDL-C in our study. This dosing strategy may be useful in patients intolerant to once-daily statin dosing, although such an approach has not been documented to reduce cardiovascular events.
Key Words: dosing, myalgia, rosuvastatin, statin
Published Online, February 19, 2008. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K604