|
|
||||||||||
Research Associate, EPICORE Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Contract Research Librarian, EPICORE Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta
Professor of Medicine (Cardiology), Department of Medicine, University of Alberta
Reprints: Dr. Tsuyuki, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 220 College Plaza, Edmonton, AB T6G 2C8, Canada, fax 780/492.6059, ross.tsuyuki{at}ualberta.ca
Although there has been a large number of trials on pharmacist care, often demonstrating clinically significant benefits, the trials generally have not changed practice or healthcare policy. What is needed are focused evidence syntheses, such as a systematic review. A systematic review is defined as a summary that addresses a focused clinical question, using methods to reduce the likelihood of bias. These reviews, which are the highest level of evidence, can help to impact policy by bringing together results of various trials. However, systematic reviews of practice research pose some unique methodologic challenges, including issues with searching, interpreting, and evaluating the available research. Well-conducted systematic reviews of pharmacist interventions could go a long way toward changing pharmacy practice and healthcare policy to recognize the important impact that pharmacists could have in the healthcare system.
Key Words: outcomes, pharmacy practice, systematic reviews
Published Online, December 2, 2008. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L302
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L Charrois and R. T Tsuyuki Comment: Sensitivity of Patient Outcomes to Pharmacist Interventions. Part III: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Hyperlipidemia Management Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2009; 43(4): 793 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||