The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 23 September 2009, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1M209.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1631-1635. DOI 10.1345/aph.1M209
© 2009 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, T. H
Right arrow Articles by Braund, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, T. H
Right arrow Articles by Braund, R.

ADHERENCE

Analysis of Medications Returned to Community Pharmacies

Tess H James, BPharm

Intern Pharmacist, Taranaki District Health Board, New Plymouth, New Zealand

Margaret L Helms, Dip Pharm

Community Pharmacist, Taranaki District Health Board

Rhiannon Braund, PhD BPharm BSc

Lecturer in Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Reprints: Dr. Braund, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand, fax 64 3 479 7034, Rhiannon. braund{at}otago.ac.nz

BACKGROUND: There are many causes of medication waste, including excess supply, treatment changes, and patient nonadherence to therapy. Investigating medication returns may indicate areas for targeting interventions to reduce waste.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the types and amounts of medications returned to community pharmacies and, specifically, to quantify the percentage of medication returned from the original dispensing, its therapeutic category, and reasons for not being used.

METHODS: Unsolicited medication returned for disposal to the 24 community pharmacies in the Taranaki region (~ 37,000 households) of New Zealand over a 6-week period was analyzed. The results were entered into a database, recording medication, amount originally issued (if known), date of issue, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, and reason for nonuse. Cross-tabulation of ATC category versus percentage returned as well as ATC category versus reason for returns was performed. Adjusted standardized residuals were investigated to determine specific cells that were in excess of the expected counts.

RESULTS: Complete information was available for 2704 items. The majority (51%) of returns contained 75–100% of the original dispensed amount of medication. For the respiratory category, 77% of the returns were in the 75–100% group, significantly more than for any other therapeutic group. Reasons for returns were recorded as bereavement (22%), surplus to requirements (17%), expired (8%), medication change (11%), dose change (3%), and unknown (39%). The cardiovascular group and respiratory groups had a higher rate of returned drugs due to medication changes and surplus to requirements, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The majority of returned medications contained greater than 75% of the original amount issued. Identification of therapeutic groups having higher rates of returns due to medication changes or surplus to requirements may suggest areas to target to reduce medication waste.

Key Words: adherence, medication waste, New Zealand

Published Online, September 22, 2009. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1M209





homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2009 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.