|
|
|
||||||||||
at time of writing, Pharmacy Resident, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; now, Clinical Pharmacist, Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center – Pharmacy Services, Miami, FL
Professor of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina
at time of this study, Cardiology Fellow, Medical University of South Carolina; now, Interventional Cardiologist, Chattanooga Heart Institute, Chattanooga, TN
at time of this study, Medicine Resident, Medical University of South Carolina; now, Cardiology Fellow, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport LA
Professor of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcome Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina
Reprints: Dr. Pallares, Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center–Pharmacy Services, 1201 NW 16th St., Miami, FL 33125, fax 305/575-3386, mjpallares{at}gmail.com
BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to clopidogrel after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement is associated with in-stent thrombosis and adverse cardiac events.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of and barriers associated with nonadherence to clopidogrel in patients receiving DES.
METHODS: Patients who received a DES between March 1, 2004, and
August 31, 2005, from a single academic medical center were eligible.
Telephone interviews were conducted 6 or more months following discharge.
Nonadherence was defined as premature discontinuation of or less than 80%
adherence to clopidogrel. Patients were asked to identify barriers to
adherence. Differences between adherent and nonadherent patients were analyzed
using
2 and t-test analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 674 patients identified, 257 (38%) participated. The nonadherence rate was 20%. The majority (58%) of nonadherent patients discontinued therapy prematurely. Patients identified the main reason for discontinuation as medical barriers (18.56%), including perceived adverse effects (9.28%). The incidence of rash was higher in patients who were nonadherent (12% vs 4%; p = 0.049). Overall, 49% of patients recalled receiving discharge counseling regarding adverse effects. A financial barrier was identified by 22 (42%) patients in the nonadherent and 73 (36%) in the adherent group, of whom 64% and 52%, respectively, reported having insurance coverage for medications. Adherent patients reported higher copays ($29.69 vs $18.14; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective studies should be conducted to aid in identifying patients at risk for nonadherence and possible in-stent thrombosis in order to identify interventions to improve adherence.
Key Words: adherence, clopidogrel, drug-eluting stents
Published Online, February 3, 2009. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L286