The Annals Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy | Now Available
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 12 May 2009, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1M008.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1139-1142. DOI 10.1345/aph.1M008
© 2009 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow Résumé Freely available
Right arrow Extracto Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badriyeh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Badriyeh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, D.

Successful Salvage Treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum Keratitis with Topical Voriconazole After Failure of Natamycin

Daoud Al-Badriyeh, BPharm(Honors)

PhD Candidate, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Lok Leung, BPharm(Honors)

Senior Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria

Geoffrey E Davies, BPharm

Pharmacist, Land Systems Division, Defence Material Organisation, Southbank, Victoria

Kay Stewart, BPharm(Honors) PhD

Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University

David Kong, BPharm MPharm PhD GCHE

Lecturer, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University

Reprints: Dr. Kong, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, fax 61 (0)3 9903 9629, david.kong{at}pharm.monash.edu.au

OBJECTIVE: To report successful management of Scedosporium apiospermum (previously known as Monosporium apiospermum) keratitis with topical voriconazole as monotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old previously well woman presented to the emergency department with a painful, injected right eye. There was no history of trauma or use of contact lenses. On examination, the right eye was estimated to have visual acuity of hand movement. Slit lamp examination detected a 2.5 x 3.5 mm dense, central corneal infiltrate with overlying epithelial defect. The eye had mild corneal edema with anterior chamber inflammation. Microbiology testing revealed S. apiospermum as the primary pathogen. Hourly administration of topical natamycin 5% resulted in initial improvement in visual acuity to 20/50, with reduction in the size of the central infiltrate. However, 1 month later, the eye infection relapsed, with recurrence of epithelial defect (3.1 x 3.1 mm) and decline in visual acuity to 20/100. Antifungal therapy was switched to topical voriconazole 1%, administered every 2 hours. Vision improved to 20/30 within 5 days, and the central defect had completely re-epithelialized within 1 week.

DISCUSSION: Treatment of S. apiospermum keratitis remains inadequate. A high natamycin minimum inhibitory concentration is necessary to treat S. apiospermum infection, which may explain the persistence of central infiltration despite ongoing therapy. The combined use of topical and oral voriconazole for the treatment of S. apiospermum keratitis has been reported. However, this is the first report of a successful clinical experience using topical voriconazole without oral therapy to manage S. apiospermum keratitis. This eliminates some disadvantages associated with oral voriconazole such as high cost, potential significant toxicity, and drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS: The voriconazole 1% eye drop used alone is a promising, cost-effective, safe option for managing fungal keratitis, even that caused by S. apiospermum. It may have a larger role to play than simply that of adjunctive therapy.

Key Words: keratitis, Scedosporium apiospermum, topical voriconazole

Published Online, May 12, 2009. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1M008


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. Al-Badriyeh, L. Leung, G. E Davies, K. Stewart, and D. Kong
Successful Use of Topical Voriconazole 1% Alone as First-Line Antifungal Therapy Against Candida albicans Keratitis
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2009; 43(12): 2103 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2009 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.