The Annals Visit the NEW pharmaCE.com
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 15 December 2009, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1M139.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VandenBussche, H. L
Right arrow Articles by Van Loo, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VandenBussche, H. L
Right arrow Articles by Van Loo, D. A


ARTICLES

A Clinical Review of Echinocandins in Pediatric Patients (January) (CE)

Heather L VandenBussche PharmD1* Dean A Van Loo PharmD2

1 Professor of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Ferris State University, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI
2 Associate Professor of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Ferris State University, Bronson Methodist Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vandenbh{at}bronsonhg.org.


   Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate available data on pediatric echinocandin use.

DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search, limited to English-language articles, was conducted (1990-August 2009) using the search terms echinocandin, pediatric, child, pharmacokinetics, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. Additional articles were retrieved from citations of selected references.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant information on the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of echinocandins in children was selected. Clinical trials, retrospective reviews, and case series were identified and evaluated. Data from these sources were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Caspofungin is the only echinocandin approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in children. Pediatric pharmacokinetics has been evaluated with all 3 echinocandins but is limited with anidulafungin. Micafungin is the most well-studied agent in prospective clinical trials for antifungal prophylaxis in stem cell transplantation and treatment of invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin has been studied prospectively for febrile neutropenia and treatment of invasive fungal infections, but most published data are from retrospective reviews or case reports. One case report of anidulafungin for neonatal candidiasis has been published. The role of echinocandins in the management of invasive pediatric fungal infections has expanded. Micafungin and caspofungin are recommended as primary or alternative treatment of candidemia and esophageal or invasive candidiasis, and as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin is recommended for neutropenic prophylaxis in stem cell transplantation, while caspofungin may be used in febrile neutropenia as an alternative to azoles. Dosing has been well established for caspofungin only in children 3 months of age and above. Anidulafungin should be avoided in children until more pharmacokinetic and clinical data become available.

CONCLUSIONS: Further comparative trials are needed to more clearly define the role of echinocandins, either as monotherapy or in combination for difficult-to-treat infections, in the pediatric population.

Key Words: anidulafungin, caspofungin, echinocandins, micafungin, pediatrics.

Reprints: Dr. VandenBussche, Ferris State University/Bronson Methodist Hospital, Pharmacy Department, 601 John St., Box #56, Kalamazoo, MI 49007, fax 269/341-7861, vandenbh@bronsonhg.org

Financial disclosure: None reported







homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
Copyright © 2009 by Harvey Whitney Books Company.