|
|
||||||||||
Pharmacotherapy Faculty, Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency, Orlando, FL
Campus Director/Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Orlando Campus, Apopka, FL
Reprints: Dr. Miller, Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency, 7975 Lake Underhill Rd., Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32822-8204, fax 407/303-6839, Shannon.miller{at}flhosp.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-February 2006) was conducted for English-language articles using the terms dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, incretin, MK-0431, and sitagliptin. Abstracts from the American Diabetes Association annual meetings in 2004 and 2005 were included as sources of data.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles pertaining to the pharmacology of sitagliptin, its pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy were reviewed.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Sitagliptin is a potent, competitive, reversible inhibitor of the DPP-IV enzyme. It is eliminated renally, with a terminal half-life of 11.8-14.4 hours. In Phase II clinical trials, sitagliptin was found to be superior to placebo for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results of a small trial comparing sitagliptin with glipizide indicate that both treatments are comparable. The efficacy of sitagliptin has also been demonstrated when used as adjunctive therapy with metformin. Few adverse effects have been reported. Weight gain and hypoglycemia have not been seen with sitagliptin therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on its unique mechanism of action, sitagliptin will provide practitioners with an additional tool in the treatment of diabetes. Review of the literature to date implies sitagliptin may be effective as monotherapy in type 2 diabetes. In addition, existing evidence supports the use of sitagliptin as adjunct therapy to sulfonylureas and metformin. Another advantage of sitagliptin use is that it appears to be free from the adverse effects of weight gain and hypoglycemia that are associated with currently available treatments.
Key Words: dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, incretin, MK-0431, sitagliptin
Published Online, July 25, 2006. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1G665
THIS ARTICLE IS APPROVED FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT
ACPE UNIVERSAL PROGRAM NUMBER: 407-000-06-018-H01
Despite this wide array of treatment options, optimal glycemic control is often unattainable. One of the therapeutic options being designed to target a key area of unexplored pathophysiology includes the incretin mimetic hormones. Incretin hormones are released from cells in the gastrointestinal tract in response to a meal provoking glucose-induced insulin release from the pancreas.2
In recent years glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1), has been the subject of intense research. GLP-1, an incretin hormone, is released from the gut postprandially. The role of GLP-1 in glucose homeostasis is evident through its role in insulin biosynthesis and secretion, as well as inhibition of glucagon release. When the blood glucose level is elevated, GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion. In addition, GLP-1 reduces appetite, slows gastric emptying, and appears to regulate the growth of insulin producing ß-cells (Figure 1). 3 Intravenous or subcutaneous administration of GLP-1 has been shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.4 However, GLP-1 is rapidly degraded through the action of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV).5 Current research is focusing on harnessing the beneficial effects of GLP-1 by inhibiting the DPP-IV enzyme. Theoretically, an inhibitor of DPP-IV should prolong the positive effects of GLP-1 by increasing the amount circulating in the blood. Additionally, because GLP-1 is released in a glucose dependent manner, DPP-IV inhibitors would not be expected to cause hypoglycemia.6
|
|
| Data Sources |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Pharmacology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical studies have shown that patients with type 2 diabetes have reduced concentrations of intact GLP-1. In a study of 24 patients, 12 subjects had type 2 diabetes and 12 were healthy matched subjects.9 After administration of a meal, blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes to determine intact GLP-1 concentrations. The investigators found that intact GLP-1 concentrations were lower in patients with diabetes at 75, 90, and 120 minutes after meal ingestion (p = 0.056, 0.017, and 0.017, respectively). It was also discovered during this period that insulin and C-peptide concentrations were decreased, indicating an abnormal insulin response. Based on these results, the investigators concluded that, in the absence of normal concentrations of intact GLP-1, the insulin response in patients with type 2 diabetes is inadequate. In an effort to overcome this deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes, DPP-IV inhibitors have been a focus of interest.
Animal
Studies in animals provided the initial evidence that inhibiting DPP-IV
increased endogenous GLP-1 concentrations and, therefore, improved glucose
tolerance and insulin secretion. Ahren et
al.10 found
that, after administering the DPP-IV inhibitor valine-pyrrolidide to mice, the
elimination of GLP-1 was prolonged. In addition, DPP-IV inhibitor
administration facilitated a rise in GLP-1 levels in response to glucose
ingestion resulting in insulin biosynthesis and secretion, thereby reducing
glucose concentrations. A study using the DPP-IV inhibitor isoleucine
thiazolidide found that circulating DPP-IV concentrations decreased by 65% in
obese and lean Zucker
rats.11 In
response to inhibition of DPP-IV, insulin secretion increased 150% and 27% in
the obese and lean rats, respectively. This in turn led to improved glucose
tolerance in both samples.
Studies conducted in mice lacking the DPP-IV enzyme further support the hypothesis that inhibition of the DPP-IV enzyme improves glycemic control. Marguet et al.12 examined the effect of DPP-IV inhibitor valine-pyrrolidide on glucose control in mice missing the DPP-IV enzyme. The investigators found that valine-pyrrolidide did not improve glucose tolerance in mice missing the enzyme. Therefore, they concluded that DPP-IV inhibitors exert all of their glucose-lowering effects through inhibition of the DPP-IV enzyme.
SITAGLIPTIN
Sitagliptin is a potent, competitive, reversible inhibitor of the DPP-IV
enzyme. The S-enantiomer is considerably less potent than the
R-enantiomer. Sitagliptin is highly selective for the DPP-IV enzyme
compared with other similar
enzymes.6
This selectivity is important as the enzymes DPP 8 and DPP 9 are very similar
to DPP-IV; however, inhibition of these enzymes has led to serious toxicities
in animals.
To date, 2 studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of sitagliptin on plasma DPP-IV concentrations in humans. One trial involving the use of sitagliptin in 11 healthy men revealed inhibition of plasma DPP-IV of 80% or higher on day 10 versus placebo.13 In addition, it was discovered that sitagliptin at doses of 25 mg/day or higher resulted in a twofold or greater increase in active GLP-1 concentrations compared with placebo (p < 0.001). A follow-up study of 32 middle-aged normoglycemic obese subjects compared sitagliptin 200 mg twice daily with placebo for 28 days.14 The investigators found that sitagliptin caused 90% inhibition of DPP-IV versus placebo (p < 0.001). In addition, after an oral glucose tolerance test, sitagliptin increased active GLP-1 levels 2.7-fold (p < 0.001) and decreased glucose AUC by 35% (p < 0.05) compared with placebo.
| Pharmacokinetics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Significant pharmacokinetic changes were not observed in a study of 8 healthy, young (18-45 y), nonobese females; 10 healthy, elderly (65-80 y), nonobese males; 10 healthy, elderly, nonobese females; and 10 healthy, young, obese subjects (BMI 30-40 kg/m2).15 In each group, 6-8 subjects received sitagliptin 50 mg and 2 received placebo. Plasma and urine samples were collected for 72 hours. AUC and maximum concentration geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals were reported. Urinary pharmacokinetics was similar across all groups (specific data not reported). The investigators concluded that, because modest differences were seen in plasma pharmacokinetics, dose adjustments for gender, age, and obesity might not be necessary.
| Clinical Trials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results from one single-dose, Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled trial have been reported. That study was followed by 8 Phase II trials, 5 of which were conducted in patients with diabetes. Results from the majority of those trials are available in abstract form only. Phase III trials began in 2004, with expected publication dates of 2006. A summary of published trials and available abstracts is provided in Table 1.
|
In the Phase I trial, researchers sought to assess the glucose-lowering ability, safety, and tolerability of sitagliptin.18 Fifty-six patients with type 2 diabetes received single doses of sitagliptin 25 mg, 200 mg, or placebo, each dose separated by a 7 day washout period. Glucose tolerance tests were performed 2 hours after a dose. Patients who received both doses of sitagliptin experienced significant reductions in the area under the glucose curve of 22% (p < 0.001) and 26% (p < 0.001), respectively, in addition to a twofold increase of concentrations of active GLP (p < 0.001). Both doses of sitagliptin also increased plasma insulin (22% and 23%; p < 0.001) and C-peptide (13% and 21%; p < 0.001) while decreasing plasma glucose (8% and 14%; p < 0.001).
Several clinical trials have documented the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin. Preliminary results from Phase II clinical trials were presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association. Results from a 12 week, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in patients with type 2 diabetes showed that use of sitagliptin led to a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1C (A1C).19 In this dose range-finding study, 552 patients with a baseline A1C of 5.8-10.4% were randomized to 1 of 5 treatment groups: placebo; sitagliptin 25, 50, or 100 mg once daily; or sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily. After 12 weeks, treatment with all doses of sitagliptin reduced A1C, with the largest reduction seen in the 100 mg once-daily group. Observed A1C differences were apparent depending on the A1C at baseline. Patients with a baseline A1C less than 7% had a reduction of 0.4%. Patients with a baseline A1C of 7-8.5% experienced a 0.6% reduction, and those with a baseline A1C of 8.5-10% had a reduction of 0.8%. Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant weight gain reported. One adverse event of hypoglycemia was reported in each of the 4 treatment groups. No adverse events of hypoglycemia were reported in the placebo group.
A limited number of trials have evaluated sitagliptin and standard antihyperglycemic management. One trial compared sitagliptin with glipizide,20 and 2 trials evaluated sitagliptin in combination with metformin.21,22 In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 743 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment groups: placebo; sitagliptin 5, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg twice daily; or glipizide 5 mg titrated to 20 mg daily.20 After 12 weeks, sitagliptin significantly reduced A1C from baseline compared with placebo. The largest reduction (0.77%) within the sitagliptin groups was seen in the 50 mg treatment arm. A slightly greater reduction (1%) occurred in the glipizide arm. At week 12, A1C results did not appear to reach a plateau in any treatment group. Similar to previous studies, treatment with sitagliptin was well tolerated, resulting in no significant weight gain. Patients who received glipizide experienced a 1.1 kg weight gain relative to placebo (no p value reported). Hypoglycemia was observed in 4% of patients taking sitagliptin, 17% of those taking glipizide, and 20% of those taking placebo. This ongoing study will further address the efficacy, safety, and ß-cell function improvement associated with sitagliptin.
In a separate trial designed to evaluate efficacy and safety, sitagliptin was added to metformin. Twenty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (average baseline A1C 7.7%) with metformin monotherapy were included in a 4 week, 2 period crossover study. Patients were required to be on a stable dose of metformin (>1500 mg/day) for at least 6 weeks prior to initiation of the study and were then randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences: adding placebo for 4 weeks followed by adding sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily or vice versa.21 At the end of each period, patients were required to remain at the investigational site for 24 hours for frequent blood sampling. After 4 weeks, patients taking metformin and sitagliptin had a 24 hour weighted mean glucose level of 125 mg/dL compared with 157 mg/dL in the metformin and placebo arms. A1C values were not reported at the conclusion of the trial, likely second to its short duration. Patients reported no increase in gastrointestinal adverse events and no hypoglycemia or weight gain.
| Clinical Trial Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although abstract information is available that further supports efficacy and safety, this information is limited by the inability to fully assess quality and design. Baseline characteristics specific to these studies have not been published and, therefore, it is difficult to ascertain which patient population may benefit from sitagliptin. Given the limited amount of trial information available, future trials of longer duration will be needed to define the use of sitagliptin in patients with diabetes. Endpoints such as fasting and postprandial glucose levels, A1C, insulin, glucagon, and C peptide levels should be further explored. Given the drug's potential to affect the immune system, long-term trials evaluating safety endpoints, such as complete blood cell counts and immunologic markers, such as T-cells, are warranted. Other safety endpoints to assess include blood pressure and platelet counts.
| Adverse Events |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are a number of substrates other than GLP-1 that DPP-IV cleaves in vitro, including hormones, neuropeptides, and chemokines.24 In many cases, the cleavage product is inactive. DPP-IV inhibitors prolong the action of hormone YY, neuropeptides such as substance P, and macrophage-derived chemokines. Potential adverse effects resulting from the prolongation of these messengers include inflammation (effect on substance P), increased blood pressure (effect on neuropeptide Y), and allergic reactions (effect on chemokines).
Other theoretical adverse effects associated with this class of drugs may
result from the inadvertent inhibition of related enzymes. Enzymes most
closely related to DPP-IV include fibroblast-activating protein-
(FAP),
DPP-II, DPP 8, and DPP 9. DPP 8 is located on activated T-cells, and DPP 9 is
located in skeletal muscle, heart, and
liver.3 These
widely distributed enzymes have been the topic of much research. Their
inhibition has been linked to toxic effects in animals, including enlarged
spleen, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and other histological pathologies.
Available data show that sitagliptin is highly selective for DPP-IV versus
other proteases such as DPP 8 and DPP
9.6,25
This may explain why serious adverse effects have not been reported with
sitagliptin. The degree to which other selective DPP-IV inhibitors will
inhibit DPP 8 and DPP 9 will likely determine their adverse effect
profiles.
Thus far, information from the limited number of clinical trials suggests that sitagliptin does not cause hypoglycemia or weight gain. This is likely due to the drug's mechanism of action. By stimulating insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, it minimizes hypoglycemia and resultant weight gain. The incidence of hypoglycemia was either similar to that with placebo or minimally noted in all trials evaluated. With no significant changes in weight noted in any of the aforementioned trials, sitagliptin may be an attractive alternative or addition to currently available therapy.
| Drug Interactions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Therapeutic Considerations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Competition will also affect the use of sitagliptin. Currently, there are several DPP-IV inhibitors undergoing clinical trials at various stages. These include LAF237 (vildagliptin; Novartis), NN 7201 (Novo Nordisk), P93/01 (Probiodrug), P32/98 (Probiodrug), and BMS477118 (Bristol-Myers Squibb). LAF237 or vildagliptin will be the most likely competitor of sitagliptin, as Phase III clinical trials started in late 2005. Studies conducted to date show promise for vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes. In a 4 week clinical trial, the effect of vildagliptin on mean 24 hour glucose and insulin levels and the glucagon response to a meal were examined.26 It was found that vildagliptin significantly reduced mean 24 hour glucose levels (p < 0.001) while insulin levels remained unchanged. In addition, the glucagon response to administration of a meal was significantly reduced (p = 0.005).
Another clinical trial was designed to investigate the efficacy of vildagliptin in metformin-treated patients over 12 and 52 weeks.27 The researchers found that, at 12 weeks, patients taking vildagliptin in combination with metformin experienced a significant (p value not reported) decrease in A1C compared with patients taking metformin plus placebo. In addition, this decrease in A1C was sustained at 52 weeks in the vildagliptin group but A1C increased in the group receiving placebo. Novo Nordisk's NN 7201 and Probiodrug's P32/98 are still in the early stages of research and development. In a study involving rats given P32/98 for 12 weeks, investigators found that P32/98 improved glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemia, and ß-cell glucose responsiveness.28 P93/01 and BMS-477118 are undergoing Phase II trials and would not be expected to be available for several years.
Finally, clinicians will examine what benefits sitagliptin afford their patients when making therapeutic decisions about its use. Not only does sitagliptin appear to have limited adverse events, but studies also suggest that the drug exhibits disease-modifying potential due to the beneficial effects GLP-1 exerts on the differentiation, proliferation, and survival of ß-cells. In addition, the inhibition of DPP-IV suppresses mediators involved in autoimmune destruction. These combined effects may have further implications for DPP-IV inhibitors in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.2
| Dosage and Administration |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In another study aimed at evaluating the DPP-IV inhibitor activity of sitagliptin, incremental doses of sitagliptin (25-600 mg daily and 300 mg twice daily) were examined.13 Researchers found that plasma DPP-IV enzyme activity was significantly inhibited at all doses. Therefore, they concluded that sitagliptin would be effective with once-daily dosing.
The exact dosage form, strength, and dosing interval to achieve maximum benefits from sitagliptin therapy have not yet been established. Based on the results of currently available studies, we anticipate that an oral dose from 25 to 200 mg once daily would be effective.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
We are grateful to Larry Lopez PharmD, Patricio Bruno DO, Robert Vandervoort PharmD, and Toni Ripley PharmD for insightful ideas and suggestions in preparation of the manuscript. We also thank William Fooshee for expert technical assistance.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Focosi, R. E. Kast, S. Galimberti, and M. Petrini Conditioning response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor via the dipeptidyl peptidase IV-adenosine deaminase complex J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2008; 84(2): 331 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Forssmann, C. Stoetzer, M. Stephan, C. Kruschinski, T. Skripuletz, J. Schade, A. Schmiedl, R. Pabst, L. Wagner, T. Hoffmann, et al. Inhibition of CD26/Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Enhances CCL11/Eotaxin-Mediated Recruitment of Eosinophils In Vivo J. Immunol., July 15, 2008; 181(2): 1120 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Bloom and M. F. Crutchlow New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in the Kidney Recipient: Diagnosis and Management Strategies Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S38 - S48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Crutchlow and R. D. Bloom Transplant-Associated Hyperglycemia: A New Look at an Old Problem Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 2(2): 343 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||