The Annals Summaries of the Latest Medical Research!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 6 March 2007, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1H234a.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 529-530. DOI 10.1345/aph.1H234a
© 2007 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowell, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Amarshi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rowell, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Amarshi, N.

Comment: Low-Dose Orlistat Effects on Body Weight of Mildly to Moderately Overweight Individuals: A 16 Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Crescent E Rowell, BS

PharmD Student, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee, 847 Monroe Avenue, Room 205K, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, fax 901/448-4731

Naseem Amarshi, MS PharmD

Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee

Published Online, March 6, 2007. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1H234a


TO THE EDITOR: The primary objective of the study by Anderson et al.1 was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose orlistat. Subjects were randomized to 2 study groups—orlistat or placebo—with both study arms required to adhere to a hypocaloric diet (1200 kcal/day). An additional study arm with an orlistat-only treatment group would have greatly added to the results of this study. Blinding would have to be maintained by not allowing study evaluators access to diet information.

The authors calculated the study's sample size based on the primary endpoint, which was the change in weight during the study period. However, the study also had secondary objectives for which the authors performed statistical analysis and drew conclusions. Since the secondary objectives were not used to calculate the sample size, the sample size may not have been adequately powered to draw conclusions about the secondary objectives.

Additionally, the results were presented as mean ± SE instead of SD. The SD provides a true measure of variability about the study sample mean. Often SE is incorrectly used and gives the impression that the variability about the sample mean is less than it really is. SE does not represent the variability about the sample mean. Instead, SE correlates with how well the sample represents the population from which it was drawn.2

This study has additional limitations in that it does not address the efficacy of orlistat with normal fat intake. Restricted diet alone has been shown to produce favorable results.3 The hypocaloric diet used in the study would have produced weight loss on its own. By restricting the fat content of the diet, the authors have limited the efficacy of orlistat based on the mechanism of action of the drug. To adequately assess the efficacy of orlistat, the authors should not have restricted the amount of fat in the participants' diets.

Although this study shows that orlistat combined with diet management can help mildly to moderately overweight individuals lose weight, it is important to realize that the study has flaws both in design and statistical evaluation. External validity is limited, due to the low calorie diet, to which most people cannot adhere on a regular basis. With orlistat recently approved for over-the-counter sale, additional safety and efficacy data are warranted.

References

  1. Anderson JW, Schwartz SM, Hauptman J, et al. Low-dose orlistat effects on body weight of mildly to moderately overweight individuals: a 16 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40:1717-23. Epub 29 Aug 2006. DOI10.1345/aph.1H234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics: part 2, descriptive statistics. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19: 309-15. Epub 17 Mar 2005. DOI10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82052-9[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Anderson JW, Luan J, Hoie LH. Structured weight-loss programs: a meta-analysis of weight loss at 24 weeks and assessment of effects of intensity of intervention. Adv Ther 2004;21:61-75.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowell, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Amarshi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rowell, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Amarshi, N.


homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue