The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 2 January 2008, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K548.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 289-290. DOI 10.1345/aph.1K548
© 2008 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B. S
Right arrow Articles by Guglielmo, B J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B. S
Right arrow Articles by Guglielmo, B J.

Daptomycin Treatment Failure for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Infective Endocarditis: Impact of Protein Binding?

Brian S Schwartz, MD

Clinical Fellow, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco - SFGH, Box 0811, 3rd and Parnassus Avenues, San Francisco, CA 94143, fax 415/648-8425, brian.schwartz{at}ucsf.edu.

Penny D Ngo, PharmD

Pediatric Clinical Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco

B Joseph Guglielmo, PharmD

Professor and Chair, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco

Published Online, January 2, 2008. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K548


TO THE EDITOR: Daptomycin is active against most gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE).1 It is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections, as well as S. aureus bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Although approved for infections due to vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis, daptomycin is not approved for infections due to E. faecium or VRE. Nonetheless, daptomycin has been used in the treatment of severe VRE infections, including bacteremia and infective endocarditis.2 The daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range for S. aureus is 0.25-1.0 µg/mL, with an MIC less than or equal to 1.0 µg/mL being considered susceptible. In contrast, the MIC range for vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis is 1-4 µg/mL, with an MIC 4.0 of µg/mL or less being considered susceptible. Maximal steady-state plasma concentrations at 8 mg/kg every 24 hours approximate 100-120 µg/mL. Daptomycin is 90-93% protein bound.3

We report a case of a 70-year-old man hospitalized for repair of aortic dissection, complicated by hemodialysis-dependent renal failure, who developed vancomycin-resistant E. faecium mitral valve infective endocarditis.

Case Report. A 70-year-old man with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia and infective endocarditis was originally treated with linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours (MIC 2 µg/mL) but remained bacteremic for 12 days on therapy. Treatment was then switched to daptomycin 6 mg/kg every 48 hours. The patient continued to be bacteremic on daptomycin 17 days into therapy. The daptomycin dose was increased to 8 mg/kg every 48 hours and gentamicin and doxycycline were added. Despite 10 days at this increased daptomycin dose and with 2 additional agents, 7 blood cultures became positive up to 24 hours after collection. The daptomycin MIC remained at 2 µg/mL throughout therapy (Laboratory Specialists, Inc.; Westlake, OH). Synergy was not present between any antibacterial combinations tested (Focus Diagnostics; Cypress, CA). On day 8 of high-dose daptomycin (8 mg/kg) therapy, a serum bactericidal assay determined at peak daptomycin concentration revealed that the concentration was neither lethal nor inhibitory at a dilution of 1:2.

After these results were obtained, daptomycin was discontinued and quinupristin/dalfopristin (MIC ≤0.5 µg/mL) therapy was initiated. Forty-eight hours after the antibacterial change, 2 sets of blood cultures were drawn; 1 of the 2 sets remained sterile, while the second set required 4 days to become positive. We were ultimately unable to sterilize the patient's blood.

Discussion. Given the known high protein-binding of daptomycin, total and unbound serum daptomycin concentrations (Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development; Hartford, CT) were obtained revealing 27.57 µg/mL and 2.64 µg/mL, respectively, 65 hours after an 8 mg/kg dose. Considering that the daptomycin half-life is 30 hours in hemodialysis patients,4 the estimated total and unbound peak serum concentrations were 125 µg/mL and 12 µg/mL, respectively. In animal models, daptomycin unbound peak concentrations of 2.5-7 times the MIC are required to produce a bacteriostatic effect, and 7-25 times the MIC are required for bactericidal effect.5 It is therefore unlikely that the unbound peak serum concentrations achieved in this patient would have been effective for treatment of endocarditis. In addition, in an animal model, the AUC of daptomycin in a fibrin clot is only one-third to one-half of that observed in serum, further limiting its efficacy in the treatment of endocarditis.6

We conclude that inadequate unbound daptomycin concentrations in the serum and cardiac vegetation contributed to failure of daptomycin in this patient. The transient response observed with quinupristin/dalfopristin, a less highly protein-bound agent, supports the suggestion that protein binding may have been important in the daptomycin failure. Presently, daptomycin cannot be recommended for the treatment of severe infections due to vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, particularly with an associated MIC of greater than or equal to 2 µg/mL.

References

  1. Carpenter CF, Chambers HF. Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:994-1000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Segreti JA, Crank CW, Finney MS. Daptomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacteremia and infective endocarditis: a retrospective case series of 31 patients. Pharmacotherapy 2006;26:347-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lee BL, Sachdeva M, Chambers HF. Effect of protein binding of daptomycin on MIC and antibacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:2505-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Package insert. Cubicin (daptomycin). Lexington, MA: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, 2007.
  5. Safdar N, Andes D, Craig WA. In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:63-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Michiels MJ, Bergeron MG. Differential increased survival of staphylococci and limited ultrastructural changes in the core of infected fibrin clots after daptomycin administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:203-11.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Future directions with daptomycin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii41 - iii49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B. S
Right arrow Articles by Guglielmo, B J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B. S
Right arrow Articles by Guglielmo, B J.


homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue