The Annals Visit the PharmaCE website!
home help contact us subscription past issues search current issue
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     



Published Online, 8 January 2008, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K524.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 290. DOI 10.1345/aph.1K524
© 2008 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by André, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gentet, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by André, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gentet, J. C.

Safety of Pegfilgrastim in Children

Nicolas André, MD PhD

Clinical Specialist, Pediatric Oncology Department, Hôpital D'Enfants de la Timone, Bd Jean Moulin 13005 Marseille Cedex 5, France, fax 33 (0) 491 386 832, nicolas.andre{at}ap-hm.fr

Emilie Milano, PharmD

Clinical Specialist, Pediatric Oncology Department, Hôpital D'Enfants de la Timone

Angelique Rome, MD

Clinical Specialist, Pediatric Oncology Department, Hôpital D'Enfants de la Timone

Jean Claude Gentet, MD

Clinical Specialist, Pediatric Oncology Department, Hôpital D'Enfants de la Timone

Published Online, January 8, 2008. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1K524


TO THE EDITOR: The recent article by Snyder and Stringham1 was of great interest. Indeed, the lack of well-conducted clinical trials to validate safe and effective doses of pegfilgrastim in children heightens the importance of reporting pegfilgrastim-induced adverse events. We would like to update our previously reported experience regarding the use of pegfilgrastim in children and add some comments regarding pegfilgrastim-induced neutrophil overshoot (defined as an absolute neutrophil count >100 x 103/µL, the level at which leukocytosis-related complications can occur).2

From September 2003 to August 2007, there were 60 pediatric patients (26 girls) with a median age of 14 years (range 10-20) and a median weight of 50.5 kg (range 30-82) who were treated for solid tumor with myelosuppressive chemotherapy in our institution received a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 µg/kg (maximum dose 6 mg) per chemotherapy cycle. Pegfilgrastim was given 48 to 72 hours after completion of the chemotherapy course. Two hundred forty-one administrations of pegfilgrastim were analyzed. Patients received a median dose of 100 µg/kg of pegfilgrastim (range 73-117); the median total number of injections per patient was 4 (range 1-14). After the administration of pegfilgrastim, the median values and extremes of the first increase in absolute neutrophil count (ANC), nadir, and second increase in ANC were 4.24 x 103/µL (range 1-65.4), 0.425 x 103/µL (range 0-9.66), and 6.02 x 103/µL (range 1-80.05), respectively.

Interestingly, none of the patients presented with neutrophil overshoot before or after nadir, with a maximum ANC of 65 x 103/µL and 80 x 103/µL, respectively. The pre- and post-nadir ANC was over 25 x 103/µL in only 20 episodes (8.5%) and 8 episodes (3.5%), respectively. Detailed values of pre- and post-nadir ANC are given in Figure 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Pre- and post-nadir ANC in children after pegfilgrastim administration. ANC = absolute neutrophil count.

 

Our results, as well as those of other small pediatric studies, are consistent with the fact that, in children, a dose of 100 µg/kg of pegfilgrastim is safe and effective.2-4 While we had previously stated our concerns regarding the potential harm of isolated or repeated high neutrophil counts resulting from pegfilgrastim-induced bone marrow intense stimulations, we did not observe any neutrophil overshoot or related complications when pegfilgrastim was given at the dose of 100 µg/kg. Additionally, as the use of colony-stimulating factor is considered a risk factor for the occurrence of secondary malignancies, no secondary malignancy was observed in the patients we report here.5

Snyder and Stringham1 assumed that the high dose of pegfilgrastim received by their patient appeared to exceed the saturable neutrophil receptor-mediated clearance and could be the cause for the occurrence of the neutrophil overshoot. We do agree with this explanation because, in their case, the child received twice the usual dosage. It is also worth mentioning that pegfilgrastim was given when the bone marrow had begun to recover.2 Nevertheless, the adverse effect reported should be considered the consequence of an overdose and should not call into question the use of pegfilgrastim in children.

Further trials are needed before routine use of pegfilgrastim can be proposed in children, with expansion to pediatric stem cell mobilization or to hasten neutrophil recovery after bone marrow, peripheral stem cell, or cord blood transplantations.

References

  1. Snyder RL, Stringham DJ. Pegfilgrastim-induced hyperleukocytosis. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:1524-30. Epub 31 Jul 2007. DOI 10.1345/aph.1K093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. André N, Kababri ME, Bertrand P, et al. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Anticancer Drugs 2007;18:277-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. te Poele EM, Kamps WA, Tamminga RY, Leeuw JA, Postma A, de Bont ES. Pegfilgrastim in pediatric cancer patients. J Pediatric Hematol Oncol 2005;27:627-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Wendelin G, Lackner H, Schwinger W, Sovinz P, Urban C. Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005;27:449-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based, clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006;19:3187-205.




This Article
Right arrow PDF
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Articles Ahead of Print
Right arrow [Order Reprint]
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by André, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gentet, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by André, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gentet, J. C.


homecopy help contact us subscription past issues search current issue