Published Online, 20 October 2009, www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L446a.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 1914-1915. DOI 10.1345/aph.1L446a
© 2009 Harvey Whitney Books Company.
Comment: Evaluation of the Modified Diet in Renal Disease Equation for Calculation of Carboplatin Dose
Mário L de Lemos, PharmD MSc (Oncol)
Provincial Drug Information Coordinator Pharmacy Department British
Columbia Cancer Agency 600-750 West Broadway Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada fax 604/708-2024
mdelemos{at}bccancer.bc.ca
Linda Hamata, BSc(Pharm)
Staff Pharmacist Pharmacy Department British Columbia Cancer
Agency
James Conklin, BSc(Pharm) ACPR
Staff Pharmacist Pharmacy Department British Columbia Cancer
Agency
Published Online, October 20, 2009. www.theannals.com, DOI 10.1345/aph.1L446a
TO THE EDITOR: Shord et
al.1 reported
similar frequencies of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and the need for dosage
modifications in their comparison of carboplatin doses based on traditional
serum creatinine (SCr)–based equations (ie, Cockcroft-Gault, Jelliffe)
versus the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. However,
they concluded that the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the
MDRD equation should not be used to estimate carboplatin doses until more data
are available.
We previously found that carboplatin dosing based on the MDRD equation was
associated with precision better than and bias similar to that of the
Cockcroft-Gault equation, compared with measured
GFR.2 More
recent studies also support these findings. Poole et
al.3 reported
no significant deviation from "true" carboplatin dose (based on
measured GFR) in similar proportions of patients between the MDRD (58%) and
the Cockcroft-Gault equations (63%). Two other studies also reported good
correlation in carboplatin dose between the 2 equations (correlation
coefficient of 0.73 and
0.88).4,5
The MDRD equation allows for the automatic reporting of estimated GFR as
part of renal biochemistry. This may reduce potential calculation errors.
Shord et al. showed that any discordance between the 2 equations is unlikely
to be clinically significant for the patient with average body size (body
surface area
1.8 m2) and renal function (SCr
1.0
mg/dL). Therefore, it seems reasonable to use either equation to guide
carboplatin dosing if measured GFR is not available, provided that the same
estimation method is used during a particular course of treatment. A similar
recommendation has been made by the British National Formulary, as well as by
expert consensus in Australia and New
Zealand.6
Footnotes
Financial disclosure: None reported
References
- Shord SS, Bressler LR, Radhakrishnan L, Chen N, Villano JL.
Evaluation of the Modified Diet in Renal Disease equation for calculation of
carboplatin dose. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:235-41.
Epub 3 Feb 2009. DOI 10.1345/aph.1L446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- de Lemos ML, Hsieh T, Hamata L, et al. Evaluation of predictive
formulae for glomerular filtration rate for carboplatin dosing in
gynecological malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:1063-9.
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.024[CrossRef][Medline]
- Poole SG, Dooley MJ, Rischin D. Calculating carboplatin doses using
the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (4-v MDRD) estimate of
glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the Calvert formula (abstract 2521). 2007
ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. J Clin Oncol 2007;25 (Jun 20 suppl):2521.
- Cooper AV, Roques TW. Can MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal
Disease) be used to estimate GFR in patients receiving carboplatin (abstract)? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007;19(3): S27.
DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2007.01.349
- Barry A, O'Cearbhaill R, Griffin D, Donnellan P, Keane M, Grimes H.
Evaluation of carboplatin dosage based on 4-variable modification of diet in
renal disease equation. Ir J Med Sci 2009;178:301-7.
Epub 11 Nov 2008. DOI 10.1007/s11845-008-0250-z[CrossRef][Medline]
- Jones GR, Mathew T, Johnson D, Peake M. Implementation of the
routine reporting of eGFR in Australia and New Zealand. Scand J Clin
Lab Invest Suppl 2008;241:23-9. DOI 10.1080/00365510802144953[Medline]